public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] about fpga
@ 2006-01-18  5:24 腾飞龙
  2006-01-18  5:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: 腾飞龙 @ 2006-01-18  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi,all,
    I'm porting u-boot-1.1.4 to (Embedded Planet)EP405 (with ppc405GPr
processor), As Denk suggested, the esd CPCI4052 board is most similiar
to my board. however CPCI4052 has FPGA configuration while my board
doesn't have FPGA, so, if i don't consider this difference during the
porting procedure because of its complexity, will the u-boot work
well? Because i can't debug u-boot now
    Thanks and best wishes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] about fpga
  2006-01-18  5:24 [U-Boot-Users] about fpga 腾飞龙
@ 2006-01-18  5:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
  2006-01-18 14:23   ` Stefan Roese
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2006-01-18  5:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In message <c002eb610601172124n72c4860dn@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
>     I'm porting u-boot-1.1.4 to (Embedded Planet)EP405 (with ppc405GPr
> processor), As Denk suggested, the esd CPCI4052 board is most similiar

I never made such a suggestion.

> to my board. however CPCI4052 has FPGA configuration while my board
> doesn't have FPGA, so, if i don't consider this difference during the
> porting procedure because of its complexity, will the u-boot work
> well? Because i can't debug u-boot now

Of course it cannot work if you try to access a non-existing FPGA.

Porting U-Boot is a complex  task,  and  this  complexity  cannot  be
ignored. At least not without consequences ;-)

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"I like your game but we have to change the rules."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] about fpga
  2006-01-18  5:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2006-01-18 14:23   ` Stefan Roese
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2006-01-18 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Wednesday 18 January 2006 06:54, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <c002eb610601172124n72c4860dn@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >     I'm porting u-boot-1.1.4 to (Embedded Planet)EP405 (with ppc405GPr
> > processor), As Denk suggested, the esd CPCI4052 board is most similiar
>
> I never made such a suggestion.

Thant was me. IIRC because of the onboard SDRAM setup.

> > to my board. however CPCI4052 has FPGA configuration while my board
> > doesn't have FPGA, so, if i don't consider this difference during the
> > porting procedure because of its complexity, will the u-boot work
> > well? Because i can't debug u-boot now
>
> Of course it cannot work if you try to access a non-existing FPGA.

You have to remove all FPGA replated code in your board port.

Best regards,
Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-18 14:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-18  5:24 [U-Boot-Users] about fpga 腾飞龙
2006-01-18  5:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-01-18 14:23   ` Stefan Roese

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox