From: Frank <frannk_m1@yahoo.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:20:43 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060410182043.73330.qmail@web32207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <443A8F3B.7050005@koansoftware.com>
--- Marco Cavallini <arm.linux@koansoftware.com> wrote:
> > Pros:
> > BDI - 10Mbit eth, Lauterbach - 100 Mbit.
> > Lauterbach scalable and simply extendable, BDI - not.
>
> Lauterbach is the best choiche for both Linux and WinCE
> targets.
> Lauterbach have *excellent* support too.
I have introduced several of my clients to the BDI2000 and have
yet to have a single one regret the selection.
I have to admit though, if they lowered their price they would
probably get more customers.
I don't understand why the have to charge $1500+ for a
differnent cpu firmware update...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 6:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35 ` [U-Boot-Users] " llandre
2006-04-10 17:58 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12 7:54 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13 6:17 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13 6:43 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 18:20 ` Frank [this message]
2006-04-10 22:04 ` Andrey Volkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060410182043.73330.qmail@web32207.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=frannk_m1@yahoo.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox