public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bodonoghue@codehermit.ie>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] Supplemental USB patch to previous 14 patches.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:42:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060531114256.4398ce08@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060530235951.50999353ADC@atlas.denx.de>

On Wed, 31 May 2006 01:59:51 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:

Hello Wolfgang.

> Please hold on for a minute. The  Makefile's  purpose  is  to  define
> dependencies.   It  is  actually  not  the  place  to  put  code  and
> configuration trickery there. Yes, I know, this  is  already  in  use
> with  other  boards, but I would like to ask you to use such features
> only when absolutely necessary.

OK I'll implement this whichever way is your preference.

I had made this addition to the Makefile as at last night's conversation

 Adder_config    \
 Adder87x_config \
 AdderII_config  \
+AdderUSB_config \
+Adder87xUSB_config \
+AdderIIUSB_config \
        :               unconfig
        $(if $(findstring AdderII,$@), \
        @echo "#define CONFIG_MPC852T" > include/config.h)
+       $(if $(findstring USB,$@),\
+       @echo "#define CONFIG_USB_TTY" >> include/config.h)
        @./mkconfig -a Adder ppc mpc8xx adder

with the following in Adder.h

/* USB TTY */
#ifdef CONFIG_USB_TTY

#include <usbd_vendor.h>                /* Include optional Vendor info */
#define CFG_USB_EXTC_CLK 0x02           /* Oscillator on EXTC_CLK 2 */
#define CFG_USB_BRG_CLK 0x04            /* or use Baud rate generator 0x04 */
#define CFG_CONSOLE_IS_IN_ENV           /* Console is in env */

#endif
 
> If you just define a new make target name this is simple and readable
> (just a single word in the Makefile), and can  be  evaluated  in  the
> board config file instead.

Hmm, I don't really understand how this would work, i.e. if the conditional
include CONFIG_USB_TTY or other *doesn't* go into config.h then how does
Adder.h know whether or not to include the console code?


Bryan

      reply	other threads:[~2006-05-31 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-29 22:47 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] Supplemental USB patch to previous 14 patches Bryan O'Donoghue
2006-05-30 18:09 ` Yuli Barcohen
2006-05-30 21:50   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2006-05-30 23:59     ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-05-31 10:42       ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060531114256.4398ce08@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bodonoghue@codehermit.ie \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox