From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:55:53 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Which configuration? In-Reply-To: <20060531124311.64780@gmx.net> References: <447d42b2.45c5968f.442a.ffff9351@mx.gmail.com> <200605311011.48334.sr@denx.de> <20060531124311.64780@gmx.net> Message-ID: <200605311455.53903.sr@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Norman, please keep the list cc'ed. On Wednesday 31 May 2006 14:43, Norman Baier wrote: > > Which one? 405GR, 405GPr, 405CR, 405EP? Or something else? It's not easy > > to > > recommened a board that fits your need the best without any knowledge > > about > > it. > > From the log on the serial port during startup: > > U-Boot 0.4.8 (Apr 14 2005 - 17:37:39) > > CPU: IBM PowerPC 405EP Rev. B at 300 MHz (PLB=100, OPB=50, EBC=33 MHz) > IIC Boot EEPROM enabled > PCI async ext clock used, internal PCI arbiter enabled > 16 kB I-Cache 16 kB D-Cache > Board: ### No HW ID - assuming WALNUT405 > > > So its an EP. How reliable ist the Walnut405 assumption? No. Walnut is the 405GP eval board. Seems that board port was kind of a quick hack, when such inaccurate information is still in the object. > > Also good to know would be what kind of FLASH you use (type and width), > > and > > how the SDRAM is connected to your CPU (DIMM module or onboard). > > RAM is onboard, but I am not very experienced in hardware and would not be > able to tell which on the FLASH chip is. As Wolfgang already told you, please contact the board manufacturer to get the U-Boot source. That's definately the best start to get it ported to the current U-Boot version. Best regards, Stefan