From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:16:39 +0100 (MET) Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Where does U-Boot's CFI driver check for top/bottom boot? In-Reply-To: <4550CA15.80605@orkun.us> References: <11628568123033-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <4550C155.2030202@freescale.com> <4550CA15.80605@orkun.us> Message-ID: <200611071918.22319.sr@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Tolunay, On Tuesday 07 November 2006 19:01, Tolunay Orkun wrote: > Questions for the maintainers: > > 1) I have some new variables for man_id, dev_id, cfi_version introduced by > this patch (actually man_id is currently not used so could be removed). I > can kept these local to the function for now or I can add them to the info > structure along with ext_addr (to easily locate the Vendor Extended Query > Structure in flash). What do you think? > > In the minimum displaying man_id, dev_id, cfi_version when executing > "flinfo" command could be useful for diagnostic purposes. We might need to > use them to tweak the behavior of some other functionality in the future as > well. Yes, I definitely think it's useful to display this ID information (or even better a real manufacturer/device string) in the "flinfo" command. So my vote is to extend the struct. > 2) There are some outdated comments at the beginning of the cfi_flash.c. > The modification history is not up to date and todo list stuff is mostly > addressed over time. Since the actual history is already is the git, I > propose to get rid of modification history and todo list from the comments. ACK. Thanks for helping out here. Best regards, Stefan