From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] IXP425 ethernet & NPE microcode
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:16:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705100716.50252.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7EDC24AB1ED682439657D3B7790609D39398AA@deepthought.Elpro.local>
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Jonathan Pratt wrote:
> I was not aware of the project. They merely point out that it's a
> necessary evil. The Intel redistribution restrictions seem rather
> draconian, however.
>
> I'm not sure about the conflict with u-boot (GPL), however, and whether
> the issues are more than philosophical.
You can include the NPE binary into U-Boot as you did, but this violates the
GPL and therefore you are not allowed to ship products using this resulting
image.
The best solution for this problem right now, if to not included the NPE
binary in the U-Boot build process, but program it into a separate FLASH
sector, and let the NPE ethernet driver load the NPE's with the binary from
this location. This way we don't have link the NPE binary into the U-Boot
image. Unfortunately nobody found the time to implement this solution till
now.
And furthermore, it would be very desireable to drop the current NPE U-Boot
ethernet driver implementation based on the original Intel code with the
complex and ugly Intel access library completely, and re-implement the driver
based on the new Linux IXP4xx NPE ethernet drivers. There are currently 2
completely new drivers without the Intel access library which will result in
lower memory footprint and much less and cleaner code.
Patches welcome! :-)
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 4:39 [U-Boot-Users] U-boot & MonteJade start up Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-02 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-02 6:22 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 7:17 ` [U-Boot-Users] IXP425 ethernet & NPE microcode Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 9:16 ` Eric BENARD
2007-05-09 9:52 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-09 20:32 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 22:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-09 22:55 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 23:16 ` David Hawkins
2007-05-10 1:50 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-10 5:16 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2007-05-10 9:04 ` Øyvind Repvik
2007-05-10 11:25 ` Stefan Roese
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-10 13:08 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-10 17:53 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-10 13:46 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-10 16:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-11 7:05 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-11 8:00 ` Stefan Roese
[not found] <4CD35CD1F8085945B597F80EEC8942135FA60A@exc01.bk.prodrive.nl>
2007-06-06 12:21 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705100716.50252.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox