From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] IXP425 ethernet & NPE microcode
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:25:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705101325.40455.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705101104.43753.repvik@kynisk.com>
On Thursday 10 May 2007, ?yvind Repvik wrote:
> > And furthermore, it would be very desireable to drop the current NPE
> > U-Boot ethernet driver implementation based on the original Intel code
> > with the complex and ugly Intel access library completely, and
> > re-implement the driver based on the new Linux IXP4xx NPE ethernet
> > drivers. There are currently 2 completely new drivers without the Intel
> > access library which will result in lower memory footprint and much less
> > and cleaner code.
>
> That would be Christian Hohnstaedt <chohnstaedt@innominate.com>'s driver
> which is (afaik) in mainstream by now, and
> Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>'s driver, which is newer. There's a
> discussion about these drivers on linux-arm-kernel.
Yes, but IIRC the one from Christian never made it into mainstream. And the
new one from Krzysztof seems to get quite good reactions.
> Getting either of those drivers fixed up and pushed to u-boot would be
> great.
Yes, both would be way better than the current implementation. Hopefully one
of those drivers will make in into mainline and this should be the one to
pick then.
> Of course, one will still need to put the microcode somewhere else
> due to licencing, but that's a minor matter.
Yes, just a minor issue from the code point of view, but a big issue from the
licensing point of view.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 4:39 [U-Boot-Users] U-boot & MonteJade start up Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-02 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-02 6:22 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 7:17 ` [U-Boot-Users] IXP425 ethernet & NPE microcode Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 9:16 ` Eric BENARD
2007-05-09 9:52 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-09 20:32 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 22:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-09 22:55 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 23:16 ` David Hawkins
2007-05-10 1:50 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-10 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-10 9:04 ` Øyvind Repvik
2007-05-10 11:25 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-10 13:08 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-10 17:53 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-10 13:46 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-10 16:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-11 7:05 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-11 8:00 ` Stefan Roese
[not found] <4CD35CD1F8085945B597F80EEC8942135FA60A@exc01.bk.prodrive.nl>
2007-06-06 12:21 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705101325.40455.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox