From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bodonoghue@codehermit.ie>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] PXA27x usbtty start up sequence
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 00:59:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070521005946.3b3ab7b9@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070521001158.6056ad5d@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 00:11:58 +0100
Bryan O'Donoghue <bodonoghue@codehermit.ie> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007 00:23:42 +0200
> Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> wrote:
>
> > The problem is that the defice __is__ into configured state (USB
> > cable is connected and /dev/ttyUSB0 is running) but nobody has
> > opened the serial line (no minicom/kermit running).
> >
> > So, I suppose, the above modification is useless...
For some reason I seem to fail to parse English occasionally I
thought you'd said your device was in the configured state but, not
physically connected to the HOST ! oops !
You are of course right checking for state configured would not fix
your stall problem if the cable is connected to your PC but, this
pseudo-code below would be a better improvement still... since we
wouldn't even bother _trying_ to send unless the bus was in the
configured state... which is what my warped mind was in fact
attempting to get at.
if(data && state == STATE_CONFIGURED && retries < 10000L){
/* Blah */
}
You're still wrong about not having to deal with EP0 control requests
after host enumeration, though. g_serial might let you away with it
but, that's just g_serial's oddities I guess. There's no reason a host
couldn't or wouldn't send you periodic get_status requests using
g_serial or any other high level USB protocol and so theoretically if
you don't respond to EP0 control requests the host can reset you ! I
doubt any other driver then g_serial would let you away with this
either !
I still think the fix is #1 above but, having re-read your email
#2
If on TX timeout you propagate an error code upwards to write_buffer,
it should be sufficient I think. write_buffer should be
smart enough to retry tx on the data that didn't get sent and
eventually the __puts() function itself should just give-up !
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-20 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-12 23:19 [U-Boot-Users] PXA27x usbtty start up sequence Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-13 12:25 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2007-05-14 6:35 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-18 17:15 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-20 13:54 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2007-05-20 16:07 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-20 21:40 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2007-05-20 22:23 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-20 23:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2007-05-20 23:59 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070521005946.3b3ab7b9@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bodonoghue@codehermit.ie \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox