From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:31:34 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to
	improveU-Boot configuration...
In-Reply-To: <00ac01c7b37f$25a04f30$dcc4af0a@atmel.com>
References: <46597312D56D2A47A3A6E9C1D0D9B7AEB0C2C0@kpladc0001.konzeptpark.intra>
	<fa686aa40706200847i7a6e21fdq9a00a49225b76cc1@mail.gmail.com>
	<00ac01c7b37f$25a04f30$dcc4af0a@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <200706202331.34546.sr@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Ulf,

On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> I think it might be worthwhile to see if we long term can
> merge the configuration with the Linux configuration
>
> I think some of the configuration items could be the same
> and could therefore use the same name.

Yes, we definitely should use the same names whenever possible. For example 
for the architecture and cpu definitions, like CONFIG_405GP or CONFIG_4xx.

But I don't think that we really should aim to merge the configuration systems 
completely. This would go too far.

> Will U-Boot break, if the Linux .config is included in the Makefile?

Hopefully not. But again, I don't think this should be our goal here.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================