[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/5] OneNAND support

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>]

In message <20070907010137.GA20130@party> you wrote:
> [PATCH] OneNAND support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/config_cmd_all.h b/include/config_cmd_all.h
> index 3d91e99..f8eca87 100644
> --- a/include/config_cmd_all.h
> +++ b/include/config_cmd_all.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
>  #define CONFIG_CMD_NAND		/* NAND support			*/
>  #define CONFIG_CMD_NET		/* bootp, tftpboot, rarpboot	*/
>  #define CONFIG_CMD_NFS		/* NFS support			*/
> +#define CONFIG_CMD_ONENAND	/* OneNAND support		*/

NAK.

CONFIG_CMD_ONENAND is definitely NOT a candiate for config_cmd_all.h


> +++ b/include/onenand_uboot.h
...
> +#define DEBUG_LEVEL			2

This should probably be 0 for production code?

> +#ifdef ONENAND_DEBUG
> +#define DEBUG(level, args...)						\
> +do {									\
> +	if (level <= DEBUG_LEVEL) {					\
> +		printf(args);						\
> +	}								\
> +} while (0)
> +#else
> +#define DEBUG(level, args...)		do { } while (0)
> +#endif

Please do not reinvent yoru own debug macros, please use the existing
ones instead.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"The X11 source code style is ATROCIOUS and should not be used  as  a
model."                                                   - Doug Gwyn