From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:20:17 +1000
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] libfdt release?
In-Reply-To: <470F1F31.7060802@grandegger.com>
References: <006E3CAD-11CB-4892-8BDB-9866677F371D@freescale.com>
	<20071010061458.GA6135@localhost.localdomain>
	<912BB32E-FD7D-4CBC-AE3D-3D358E97DECB@freescale.com>
	<20071011041239.GF14873@localhost.localdomain>
	<9917D225-2082-4900-BFD4-96490EA88C42@freescale.com>
	<470EB351.4070009@gmail.com>
	<20071012042811.GK21056@localhost.localdomain>
	<470F1F31.7060802@grandegger.com>
Message-ID: <20071015032017.GH14108@localhost.localdomain>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:16:01AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:35:45PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>>>>* Replace fdt_node_offset() with fdt_find_node_by_path().
> >>>>There is no fdt_node_offset(), fdt_path_offset() they mean, maybe.
> >>>>And why a gratuitous name change...?
> >>>Jerry?
> >>We needed the function (Detlev, IIRC).  The gratuitous name change was 
> >>intended to be more descriptive.  Perhaps if the correct original name 
> >>were used, we wouldn't have needed a gratuitous name change. ;-)
> >
> >Heh.
> >
> >Do bear in mind in future that the naming conventions in libfdt aren't
> >arbitrary.  I've tried to put "offset" in the name of everything that
> >returns a structure block offset as a hint to that return convention.
> >Additionally it's supposed to mitigate the big libfdt gotcha - that
> >offsets aren't handles, so the offset for a node can change if you
> >alter another node.
> 
> I proposed the name change some time ago on this list:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4639F61F.2050506%40grandegger.com&forum_name=u-boot-users
> 
> And they have been accepted and nobody complained ;-).

Well, of course not; I'm not on the u-boot list.

> The main reason 
> for the change was to make them (almost) compatible with the names used 
> by Linux. I think that's useful when we start using FDT for configuring 
> U-Boot.

Well, you have my reasons for *not* doing that, above.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson