From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2 (resubmit)] NET: Cosmetic changes
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 06:45:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711050645.53687.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472E5573.70500@arlinx.com>
On Monday 05 November 2007, Larry Johnson wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > In message <4728AB89.80205@arlinx.com> you wrote:
> >> - int (* read)(char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> - unsigned char reg, unsigned short *value);
> >> - int (* write)(char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> - unsigned char reg, unsigned short value);
> >
> > The old code used TAB for indentation. Good.
> >
> >> + int (*read) (char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> + unsigned char reg, unsigned short *value);
> >> + int (*write) (char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> + unsigned char reg, unsigned short value);
> >
> > Now you add to the file size by indeting with characters which is,
> > strictly speaking, a violation of the Coding Style).
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wolfgang Denk
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Unfortunately, it was "Lindent" that broke the indentation. Apparently,
> when a parameter list to a function call doesn't fit on a line, it tries
> to line up additional parameters beneath the first one.
Right. And this is exactly the style I prefer too (and my emacs ;)).
> I could search for and fix these cases, but it would defeat the purpose
> of posting these cosmetic changes, which was so that the next time
> someone uses "Lindent" on the file to check modifications, he or she
> won't get a bunch of changes to the unmodified parts of the code.
I vote for accepting this patch (and others with this indentation style),
since it's a common used pratice. And as Larry explained, even Lindent uses
it by default. We shouldn't dictate each and every bit, how sourcecode should
be layouted. A little bit of personal freedom should be possible here.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-05 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 16:21 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2 (resubmit)] NET: Cosmetic changes Larry Johnson
2007-11-03 21:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-11-04 23:27 ` Larry Johnson
2007-11-05 5:45 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711050645.53687.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox