public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2 (resubmit)] NET: Cosmetic changes
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 06:45:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711050645.53687.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472E5573.70500@arlinx.com>

On Monday 05 November 2007, Larry Johnson wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > In message <4728AB89.80205@arlinx.com> you wrote:
> >> -	int (* read)(char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> -			unsigned char reg, unsigned short *value);
> >> -	int (* write)(char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> -			unsigned char reg, unsigned short value);
> >
> > The old code used TAB for indentation. Good.
> >
> >> +	int (*read) (char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> +		     unsigned char reg, unsigned short *value);
> >> +	int (*write) (char *devname, unsigned char addr,
> >> +		      unsigned char reg, unsigned short value);
> >
> > Now you add to the file size by indeting with characters which is,
> > strictly speaking, a violation of the Coding Style).
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wolfgang Denk
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Unfortunately, it was "Lindent" that broke the indentation.  Apparently,
> when a parameter list to a function call doesn't fit on a line, it tries
> to line up additional parameters beneath the first one.

Right. And this is exactly the style I prefer too (and my emacs ;)).

> I could search for and fix these cases, but it would defeat the purpose
> of posting these cosmetic changes, which was so that the next time
> someone uses "Lindent" on the file to check modifications, he or she
> won't get a bunch of changes to the unmodified parts of the code.

I vote for accepting this patch (and others with this indentation style), 
since it's a common used pratice. And as Larry explained, even Lindent uses 
it by default. We shouldn't dictate each and every bit, how sourcecode should 
be layouted. A little bit of personal freedom should be possible here.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

      reply	other threads:[~2007-11-05  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-31 16:21 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2 (resubmit)] NET: Cosmetic changes Larry Johnson
2007-11-03 21:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-11-04 23:27   ` Larry Johnson
2007-11-05  5:45     ` Stefan Roese [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711050645.53687.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox