[U-Boot-Users] Mixing CFI and non-CFI flashs?

[Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>]

On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better not to remove those unused fields? This way porting
> > of new devices from Linux to U-Boot would be easier.
>
> Right. I was concerned about the size of the table - the complete table
> from Linux contains *lots* of devices and may take up quite some space, so
> stripping out unused fields should help a bit. If there is a consensus to
> keep the fields to ease porting new parts, that is fine with me.

I vote for keeping the fields in. From my point of view, it's better to only 
enable a small part of the available FLASH definitions, than to strip some 
fields from the struct and make porting more difficult.

> I think in the future we may need some ifdefs in the table to select
> sub-sets of supported parts - if a board has a 29LV040, it is useful to
> have support for other flash ROMS with similar layout and pinout that may
> be used as alternatives, but completely different parts (eg. 29LV160) may
> be left out.

ACK.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================