From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:58:41 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/5] AT91CAP9 support : board/ files In-Reply-To: <20080203135435.46004d53@siona> References: <1201814156-15777-1-git-send-email-stelian@popies.net> <000201c864b0$923e7e90$2101a8c0@atmel.com> <1201899144.7645.18.camel@galileo> <200802020659.35968.sr@denx.de> <1201987554.6065.3.camel@galileo> <20080203135435.46004d53@siona> Message-ID: <20080203205840.GA32030@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 13:54 Sun 03 Feb , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:25:54 +0100 > Stelian Pop wrote: > > > Le samedi 02 f?vrier 2008 ? 06:59 +0100, Stefan Roese a ?crit : > > > > > > I did think of that. I have no strong feeling about that. Except that if > > > > we put at91cap9adk under board/atmel, at91rm9200dk should go there too. > > > > > > Right. I always prefer to "collect" board ports from one manufacturer/brand > > > into a specific directory. > > > > Manufacturer or brand/type ? Meaning, what do we do with the other AT91 > > based boards, which are not made by Atmel (cmc_pu2, csb637, kb9202, > > mp2usb) ? > > I think they should be collected according to board manufacturer or > brand, not cpu type. So boards/atmel is for boards manufactured by > Atmel, not all boards that happen to have an Atmel cpu on them. I agree too, they should be collected according to board manufacturer not cpu type. Best Regards, J.