From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:30:52 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing
	MAC	addresses
In-Reply-To: <20080301110614.GT16684@chiana.homelinux.org>
References: <20080229130318.GR16684@chiana.homelinux.org>
	<20080229134908.GS16684@chiana.homelinux.org>
	<20080229160737.GA8754@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
	<20080301110614.GT16684@chiana.homelinux.org>
Message-ID: <20080303193052.GA6790@loki.buserror.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > Looks like something that was introduced between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc3;
> > > does this mean that u-boot-1.3.2 will not be able to boot 834x
> > > processors (networking that is) with kernels before 2.6.25?
> > 
> > No, it just means you need the newer device tree.
> 
> Of course, but since the device tree is part of the kernel, 

It's not part of it; it just happens to be distributed with the kernel. 

There's no reason why u-boot couldn't have its own repository of device
trees.

-Scott