From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:48:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080325134854.GA25951@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080324180049.73f2f60b.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:00:49PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:44:19 +0300
> Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:35:58PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:20:18 +0300
> > > Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/fdt_support.h b/include/fdt_support.h
> > > > index 7836f28..c10de8a 100644
> > > > --- a/include/fdt_support.h
> > > > +++ b/include/fdt_support.h
> > > > @@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ int fdt_find_and_setprop(void *fdt, const char *node, const char *prop,
> > > > const void *val, int len, int create);
> > > > void fdt_fixup_qe_firmware(void *fdt);
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB
> > > > +void fdt_fixup_dr_usb(void *blob, bd_t *bd);
> > > > +#else
> > > > +static inline void fdt_fixup_dr_usb(void *blob, bd_t *bd) {}
> > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB */
> > > > +
> > >
> > > this looks like a prime candidate for a weak function (which would also
> > > eliminate the need for the new CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB introduced here).
> >
> > Are you sure it's supposed to work like this?.. I don't see the linker
> > dropping unused weak symbols with the patch below.
>
> with something like the following I get 24 bytes more text in
> fdt_support.o, and 200 total bytes added 83xx-wide:
>
[...]
> but the QE based 83xx SoCs don't use this fixup. So while
> CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB gives you more control, I doubt saving 200 bytes
> justifies the new config either. Either way really, but I tend to be
> against any new CONFIG_s.
Hm... maybe then it's better to place fdt_fixup_usb_dr function
inside the fdt_support.h, marking it with static inline -- it's used
just once per board anyway..? Then neither space wasted nor the new
configs introduced.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cboumailru at gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 20:20 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role Anton Vorontsov
2008-03-20 1:35 ` Kim Phillips
2008-03-24 14:44 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-03-24 23:00 ` Kim Phillips
2008-03-25 13:48 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-03-25 15:42 ` Kim Phillips
2008-03-25 16:06 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-03-25 16:32 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-03-25 16:33 ` Kim Phillips
2008-03-25 16:35 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-03-26 0:27 ` Kim Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080325134854.GA25951@localhost.localdomain \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox