From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:18:29 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
In-Reply-To: <1208164773.6399.34.camel@galileo>
References: <1208027002.23686.7.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden>
	<1208093818.23686.11.camel@voyager.dsnet>
	<02bf01c89df4$fe986380$040514ac@atmel.com>
	<1208164773.6399.34.camel@galileo>
Message-ID: <20080414111829.GC17663@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 11:19 Mon 14 Apr     , Stelian Pop wrote:
> 
> Le lundi 14 avril 2008 ? 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> > > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> > >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
> > > 
> > > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
> > > standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
> > > boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > -- 
> > > Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > It is mainly time related.
> > This flash driver is well tested on the AT91RM9200EK.
> > The standard CFI driver is not.
> > While CFI should work, I do not have time to make a thorough test.
> 
> Linux seems to use the CFI driver, just like every other SAM/CAP board,
> so it should be safe to switch to the standard CFI driver.

I agree with Stelian, I prefer you use the CFI driver, but I known that
there is somme difference between then. Untill you've test and qualify the CFI
driver for the AT91RM9200EK. I'll ack your patch.

Best Regards,
J.