* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
@ 2008-03-24 17:53 Scott Wood
2008-04-13 22:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2008-03-24 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Some hardware, such as the enhanced local bus controller used on some
mpc83xx chips, does ecc transparently when reading and writing data, rather
than providing a generic calculate/correct mechanism that can be exported to
the nand subsystem.
The subsystem should not BUG() when calculate, correct, or hwctl are
missing, if the methods that call them have been overridden.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
This patch applies to the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch of the nand tree.
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 576b0db..319696d 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -2593,8 +2593,12 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
chip->ecc.write_oob = nand_write_oob_std;
case NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME:
- if (!chip->ecc.calculate || !chip->ecc.correct ||
- !chip->ecc.hwctl) {
+ if ((!chip->ecc.calculate || !chip->ecc.correct ||
+ !chip->ecc.hwctl) &&
+ (!chip->ecc.read_page ||
+ chip->ecc.read_page == nand_read_page_hwecc ||
+ !chip->ecc.write_page ||
+ chip->ecc.write_page == nand_write_page_hwecc)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "No ECC functions supplied, "
"Hardware ECC not possible\n");
BUG();
--
1.5.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
2008-03-24 17:53 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way Scott Wood
@ 2008-04-13 22:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-14 16:34 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-04-13 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <20080324175302.GA1280@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> Some hardware, such as the enhanced local bus controller used on some
> mpc83xx chips, does ecc transparently when reading and writing data, rather
> than providing a generic calculate/correct mechanism that can be exported to
> the nand subsystem.
>
> The subsystem should not BUG() when calculate, correct, or hwctl are
> missing, if the methods that call them have been overridden.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
This should go through the 83xx custodian, but I haven't seen this
yet?
Anyway, it does not apply any more:
Applying Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
error: patch failed: drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c:2593
error: drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c: patch does not apply
fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless
(drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c).
Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
When all is said and done, more is said than done.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
2008-04-13 22:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-04-14 16:34 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2008-04-14 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:01:54AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20080324175302.GA1280@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> > Some hardware, such as the enhanced local bus controller used on some
> > mpc83xx chips, does ecc transparently when reading and writing data, rather
> > than providing a generic calculate/correct mechanism that can be exported to
> > the nand subsystem.
> >
> > The subsystem should not BUG() when calculate, correct, or hwctl are
> > missing, if the methods that call them have been overridden.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>
> This should go through the 83xx custodian, but I haven't seen this
> yet?
Why should it go through 83xx? It's a patch against generic NAND code.
> Anyway, it does not apply any more:
>
> Applying Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
> error: patch failed: drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c:2593
> error: drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c: patch does not apply
> fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> (drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c).
> Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
> Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
Did you try applying it against the 2.6.22.1 branch of the nand
repository (IIRC, the non-commit-message patch comment specified that)?
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
2008-04-14 16:34 ` Scott Wood
@ 2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-14 19:55 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-04-14 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <20080414163455.GA7061@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>
> > > Some hardware, such as the enhanced local bus controller used on some
> > > mpc83xx chips, does ecc transparently when reading and writing data, rather
> > > than providing a generic calculate/correct mechanism that can be exported to
> > > the nand subsystem.
> > >
> > > The subsystem should not BUG() when calculate, correct, or hwctl are
> > > missing, if the methods that call them have been overridden.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> >
> > This should go through the 83xx custodian, but I haven't seen this
> > yet?
>
> Why should it go through 83xx? It's a patch against generic NAND code.
It seems to be 83xx specific code to me?
> > Anyway, it does not apply any more:
> >
> > Applying Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
> > error: patch failed: drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c:2593
> > error: drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c: patch does not apply
> > fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> > (drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c).
> > Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
> > Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
>
> Did you try applying it against the 2.6.22.1 branch of the nand
> repository (IIRC, the non-commit-message patch comment specified that)?
No, I tried to apply this to the U-Boot repository. Maybe this was my
fault? Is this supposed to go into Linux, then?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Murder is contrary to the laws of man and God.
-- M-5 Computer, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-04-14 19:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-15 4:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-18 15:08 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2008-04-14 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20080414163455.GA7061@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>>>> Some hardware, such as the enhanced local bus controller used on some
>>>> mpc83xx chips, does ecc transparently when reading and writing data, rather
>>>> than providing a generic calculate/correct mechanism that can be exported to
>>>> the nand subsystem.
>>>>
>>>> The subsystem should not BUG() when calculate, correct, or hwctl are
>>>> missing, if the methods that call them have been overridden.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>>> This should go through the 83xx custodian, but I haven't seen this
>>> yet?
>> Why should it go through 83xx? It's a patch against generic NAND code.
>
> It seems to be 83xx specific code to me?
It's not. It is removing a restriction in the NAND code that happens to
interfere with what the FSL NAND driver needs to do.
>> Did you try applying it against the 2.6.22.1 branch of the nand
>> repository (IIRC, the non-commit-message patch comment specified that)?
>
> No, I tried to apply this to the U-Boot repository. Maybe this was my
> fault? Is this supposed to go into Linux, then?
No, it's supposed to go into the 2.6.22.1 branch of Stefan's u-boot NAND
tree. This change is already in the Linux NAND code.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
2008-04-14 19:55 ` Scott Wood
@ 2008-04-15 4:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-18 15:08 ` Stefan Roese
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-04-15 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <4803B6AC.50603@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> > No, I tried to apply this to the U-Boot repository. Maybe this was my
> > fault? Is this supposed to go into Linux, then?
>
> No, it's supposed to go into the 2.6.22.1 branch of Stefan's u-boot NAND
> tree. This change is already in the Linux NAND code.
I see. OK, so it's really Stefan who needs to react here.
Thanks for the explanations.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Only in our dreams we are free. The rest of the time we need wages.
- Terry Pratchett, _Wyrd Sisters_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.
2008-04-14 19:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-15 4:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-04-18 15:08 ` Stefan Roese
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-04-18 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Monday 14 April 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Did you try applying it against the 2.6.22.1 branch of the nand
> >> repository (IIRC, the non-commit-message patch comment specified that)?
> >
> > No, I tried to apply this to the U-Boot repository. Maybe this was my
> > fault? Is this supposed to go into Linux, then?
>
> No, it's supposed to go into the 2.6.22.1 branch of Stefan's u-boot NAND
> tree. This change is already in the Linux NAND code.
I'll update the 2.6.22.1 branch shortly (when time permits). Sorry for the
delay.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-18 15:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-24 17:53 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way Scott Wood
2008-04-13 22:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-14 16:34 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-14 19:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-15 4:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-18 15:08 ` Stefan Roese
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox