From: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi-flash: Add CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:22:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804201522.40808.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080420011410.709C5248A0@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
even though I like the weak stuff, I agree with you. I also like Stefan's
idea about removing the #ifdef from the code.
So I will update my patch in this direction.
The main idea behind my patch is to fix the bootloader autoprotection
for 4xx. Do you (sr, J., others) think i is also a good idea to add this:
/* Monitor protection ON by default */
#if (CFG_MONITOR_BASE >= CFG_FLASH_BASE)
flash_protect (FLAG_PROTECT_SET,
CFG_MONITOR_BASE,
+#if defined(CONFIG_4xx)
0xffffffff,
+#else
CFG_MONITOR_BASE + monitor_flash_len - 1,
+#endif
flash_get_info(CFG_MONITOR_BASE));
#endif
To be honest, I hope to get my autoprotection patch into 1.3.3 (as a bug fix).
But the above three lines would be satisfactory for fixing the issue.
Finally I would like to have both changes applied.
Matthias
On Sunday 20 April 2008 03:14:10 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20080418160157.GB12486@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> > > +#if defined(CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST)
> > > + struct apl_s {
> > > + ulong start;
> > > + ulong size;
> > > + } apl[] = CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > I think it will be better to create a weak structure.
>
> In the interest of memory footprint I prefer to stick with the #ifdef
> here.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-20 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 14:29 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi-flash: Add CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-18 16:01 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-04-19 11:30 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-19 12:02 ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-19 14:50 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-19 15:33 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi-flash: Add?CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-04-19 17:22 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-20 3:54 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi-flash:?Add?CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-04-20 23:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-20 1:14 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi-flash: Add CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-20 13:22 ` Matthias Fuchs [this message]
2008-04-20 21:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804201522.40808.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com \
--to=matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox