public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] intended behavior of bootm
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:43:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804211743.19114.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480CAFD5.7070804@ge.com>

Hi Jerry,

On Monday 21 April 2008 17:16, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > after going through the boom code I found out, that
> > setting the 'autostart' variable to 'no' brings me a little closer
> > to what I want. But finally I end up
> > in the enable_interrupts() at the very end of do_bootm(). This freezes
> > my system. The reason for this is the Linux kernel image that is loaded to address 0
> > and that overwrites the vector table. So reenabling the interrupts in U-Boot with
> > Linux interrupt table is a bad idea.
> 
> No, having your (u-boot) interrupt go off while booting linux is a bad idea.
U-Boot calls disable_interrupt() in do_bootm(). That's fact.

> 
> Which interrupt is going off?  Why is it going off (why isn't the 
> hardware put into a quiescent state)?
> 
> > So what's the best idea to fix this? I could copy the vector table onto the stack
> > in do_bootm() and copy it back just before reenabling the interrupts.
> 
> NO NO NO.
At least this works :-)

> 
> > Any better idea?
> > 
> > Matthias
> 
> That a u-boot initialized interrupt is occurring is wrong and needs to 
> be fixed.
> * Traditionally, u-boot does not use interrupts for anything, thus this 
> isn't a problem.
> 
> * Proper hardware and device driver convention is that the hardware must 
> be quiescent when linux is started and the linux device driver must 
> (re)configure that hardware the way it wants/needs.  Obviously, this is 
> probably a 95% rule (console I/O, memory initialization, some others may 
> violate this rule for practical reasons).
> 
> * If your u-boot enables interrupt(s), you MUST disable the interrupt 
> source before starting linux.  There is NO graceful way of getting linux 
> to handle an interrupt that was a result of u-boot's running.  Starting 
> linux with interrupts disabled is not a good solution - you may get 
> lucky but leaving an active interrupt source is a dangerous game.  At 
> best, it is a race condition that you may happen to win today.
So this means that U-Boot calling disable_interrupts before booting Linux (see do_bootm)
is correct. Later my the kernel images is loaded at address 0. This overwrites all U-Boot vectors
in the first 16k of RAM. So when after the kernel is loaded to address 0 and the ramdisk 
CRC checking failed to control is to be passed back to U-Boot it sees a mixed up vector table.
I think the only ways to fix this is to save the table (as I did for testing) or check the ramdisk
images before uncompressing the kernel at address 0.

Except from that I just noticed that 'autostart=no' does not help me, because it completely disables booting
the kernel from bootm.

So how can I achive this:

bootm $(kernel_addr_in_flash) $(randisk_addr_in_flash); run load_images_from_usb_to_ram; bootm $(kernel_addr_in_ram) $(ramdisk_addr_in_ram)

So the the initial bootm fails because of invalid images, U-Boot should load images from a USB media and start them.

Matthias

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-21 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-21 13:09 [U-Boot-Users] intended behavior of bootm Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-21 14:58 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-21 15:16   ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-04-21 15:43     ` Matthias Fuchs [this message]
2008-04-21 16:28       ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-04-21 19:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-21 21:02   ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-04-22 20:49     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-23  8:43       ` Matthias Fuchs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804211743.19114.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com \
    --to=matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox