From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 17:22:39 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH] SPI API improvements In-Reply-To: <1210346484-1313-1-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com> References: <1210346484-1313-1-git-send-email-haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com> Message-ID: <200805091722.41084.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday 09 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > This patch hasn't been tested on all the boards involved, so there are > probably a few issues. For now, I'd like some comments on the new > interface -- if it looks good, we should spend some additional effort > to validate that it doesn't introduce any breakage. I could use some > help with this. just a quick glance, but do we care about U-Boot being a SPI slave ? i only noticed this as i was working on the Blackfin I2C driver recently and realized that the I2C framework has defines for U-Boot to act as a slave. not that the Blackfin driver even has any of the slave stuff implemented, i just noticed it ;). -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080509/c815f624/attachment.pgp