* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
@ 2008-06-02 10:11 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-02 11:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-02 22:12 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2008-06-02 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal
hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief
list of furher modifications:
- For the time being, the UPM setup writing the UPM array has been
removed from the driver and must now be done by the board specific
code.
- The bus width definition in "struct fsl_upm_nand" is now in bits to
comply with the corresponding Linux driver.
- chip->dev_read is only set if fun->dev_ready != NULL, which is
required for boards not connecting the R/B pin.
- A few issue have been fixed with MxMR bit manipulation like in the
corresponding Linux driver.
Note: I think the "io_addr" field of "struct fsl_upm" could be removed
as well, because the address is already determined by
"nand->IO_ADDR_[RW]", but I'm not 100% sure.
This patch has been tested on a TQM8548 modules with the NAND chip
Micron MT29F8G08FABWP.
This patch is based on the following patches posted to this list a few
minutes ago:
[PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot
[PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions
Anton, could you please verify if it works on your MPC8360ERDK board as
well. A patch will follow. In principle, the NAND driver of the TQM8272
should work with it as well.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------
include/linux/mtd/fsl_upm.h | 1
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
===================================================================
--- u-boot.orig/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
+++ u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
@@ -20,112 +20,89 @@
#include <linux/mtd/fsl_upm.h>
#include <nand.h>
-#define FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_NO (0 << 28) /* normal operation */
-#define FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_WA (1 << 28) /* write array */
-#define FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_RA (2 << 28) /* read array */
-#define FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_RP (3 << 28) /* run pattern */
+static int fsl_upm_in_pattern;
static void fsl_upm_start_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm, u32 pat_offset)
{
- out_be32(upm->mxmr, FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_RP | pat_offset);
+ clrsetbits_be32(upm->mxmr, MxMR_MAD_MSK, MxMR_OP_RUNP | pat_offset);
}
static void fsl_upm_end_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm)
{
- out_be32(upm->mxmr, FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_NO);
- while (in_be32(upm->mxmr) != FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_NO)
+ clrbits32(upm->mxmr, MxMR_OP_RUNP);
+
+ while (in_be32(upm->mxmr) & MxMR_OP_RUNP)
eieio();
}
static void fsl_upm_run_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm, int width, u32 cmd)
{
- out_be32(upm->mar, cmd << (32 - width * 8));
- out_8(upm->io_addr, 0x0);
-}
-
-static void fsl_upm_setup(struct fsl_upm *upm)
-{
- int i;
-
- /* write upm array */
- out_be32(upm->mxmr, FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_WA);
-
- for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
- out_be32(upm->mdr, upm->array[i]);
+ out_be32(upm->mar, cmd << (32 - width));
+ switch (width) {
+ case 8:
out_8(upm->io_addr, 0x0);
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ out_be16(upm->io_addr, 0x0);
+ break;
+ case 32:
+ out_be32(upm->io_addr, 0x0);
+ break;
}
-
- /* normal operation */
- out_be32(upm->mxmr, FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_NO);
- while (in_be32(upm->mxmr) != FSL_UPM_MxMR_OP_NO)
- eieio();
}
-static void fun_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned command, int column,
- int page_addr)
+static void nand_hwcontrol (struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct fsl_upm_nand *fun = chip->priv;
- fsl_upm_start_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->upm_cmd_offset);
-
- if (command == NAND_CMD_SEQIN) {
- int readcmd;
-
- if (column >= mtd->oobblock) {
- /* OOB area */
- column -= mtd->oobblock;
- readcmd = NAND_CMD_READOOB;
- } else if (column < 256) {
- /* First 256 bytes --> READ0 */
- readcmd = NAND_CMD_READ0;
- } else {
- column -= 256;
- readcmd = NAND_CMD_READ1;
- }
- fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width, readcmd);
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case NAND_CTL_SETCLE:
+ fsl_upm_start_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->upm_cmd_offset);
+ fsl_upm_in_pattern++;
+ break;
+ case NAND_CTL_SETALE:
+ fsl_upm_start_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->upm_addr_offset);
+ fsl_upm_in_pattern++;
+ break;
+ case NAND_CTL_CLRCLE:
+ case NAND_CTL_CLRALE:
+ fsl_upm_end_pattern(&fun->upm);
+ fsl_upm_in_pattern--;
+ break;
}
+#if 1
+ /* Temorary check */
+ if (fsl_upm_in_pattern < 0 || fsl_upm_in_pattern > 1)
+ printf("fsl_upm: Oops, unexpected fsl_upm_in_pattern %d\n",
+ fsl_upm_in_pattern);
+#endif
+}
- fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width, command);
-
- fsl_upm_end_pattern(&fun->upm);
-
- fsl_upm_start_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->upm_addr_offset);
-
- if (column != -1)
- fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width, column);
+static void nand_write_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char byte)
+{
+ struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
- if (page_addr != -1) {
- fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width, page_addr);
- fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width,
- (page_addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
- if (chip->chipsize > (32 << 20)) {
- fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width,
- (page_addr >> 16) & 0x0f);
- }
- }
+ if (fsl_upm_in_pattern) {
+ struct fsl_upm_nand *fun = chip->priv;
- fsl_upm_end_pattern(&fun->upm);
+ fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width, byte);
- if (fun->wait_pattern) {
/*
* Some boards/chips needs this. At least on MPC8360E-RDK we
* need it. Probably weird chip, because I don't see any need
* for this on MPC8555E + Samsung K9F1G08U0A. Usually here are
* 0-2 unexpected busy states per block read.
*/
- while (!fun->dev_ready())
- debug("unexpected busy state\n");
+ if (fun->wait_pattern) {
+ while (!fun->dev_ready())
+ debug("unexpected busy state\n");
+ }
+ } else {
+ out_8(chip->IO_ADDR_W, byte);
}
}
-static void nand_write_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char byte)
-{
- struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
-
- out_8(chip->IO_ADDR_W, byte);
-}
-
static u8 nand_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
@@ -164,10 +141,6 @@ static int nand_verify_buf(struct mtd_in
return 0;
}
-static void nand_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd)
-{
-}
-
static int nand_dev_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
@@ -179,22 +152,20 @@ static int nand_dev_ready(struct mtd_inf
int fsl_upm_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip, struct fsl_upm_nand *fun)
{
/* yet only 8 bit accessors implemented */
- if (fun->width != 1)
+ if (fun->width != 8 && fun->width != 16 && fun->width != 32)
return -ENOSYS;
- fsl_upm_setup(&fun->upm);
-
chip->priv = fun;
chip->chip_delay = fun->chip_delay;
chip->eccmode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
- chip->cmdfunc = fun_cmdfunc;
chip->hwcontrol = nand_hwcontrol;
chip->read_byte = nand_read_byte;
chip->read_buf = nand_read_buf;
chip->write_byte = nand_write_byte;
chip->write_buf = nand_write_buf;
chip->verify_buf = nand_verify_buf;
- chip->dev_ready = nand_dev_ready;
+ if (fun->dev_ready)
+ chip->dev_ready = nand_dev_ready;
return 0;
}
Index: u-boot/include/linux/mtd/fsl_upm.h
===================================================================
--- u-boot.orig/include/linux/mtd/fsl_upm.h
+++ u-boot/include/linux/mtd/fsl_upm.h
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
struct fsl_upm {
- const u32 *array;
void __iomem *mdr;
void __iomem *mxmr;
void __iomem *mar;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
2008-06-02 10:11 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2008-06-02 11:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-02 13:02 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-02 22:12 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anton Vorontsov @ 2008-06-02 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
>
> This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal
> hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief
> list of furher modifications:
>
> - For the time being, the UPM setup writing the UPM array has been
> removed from the driver and must now be done by the board specific
> code.
>
> - The bus width definition in "struct fsl_upm_nand" is now in bits to
> comply with the corresponding Linux driver.
>
> - chip->dev_read is only set if fun->dev_ready != NULL, which is
> required for boards not connecting the R/B pin.
>
> - A few issue have been fixed with MxMR bit manipulation like in the
> corresponding Linux driver.
>
> Note: I think the "io_addr" field of "struct fsl_upm" could be removed
> as well, because the address is already determined by
> "nand->IO_ADDR_[RW]", but I'm not 100% sure.
>
> This patch has been tested on a TQM8548 modules with the NAND chip
> Micron MT29F8G08FABWP.
>
> This patch is based on the following patches posted to this list a few
> minutes ago:
>
> [PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot
> [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions
>
> Anton, could you please verify if it works on your MPC8360ERDK board as
> well. A patch will follow. In principle, the NAND driver of the TQM8272
> should work with it as well.
Works great here (tested on MPC8360E-RDK). Thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
2008-06-02 11:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
@ 2008-06-02 13:02 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-02 15:03 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2008-06-02 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
>>
>> This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal
>> hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief
>> list of furher modifications:
>>
>> - For the time being, the UPM setup writing the UPM array has been
>> removed from the driver and must now be done by the board specific
>> code.
>>
>> - The bus width definition in "struct fsl_upm_nand" is now in bits to
>> comply with the corresponding Linux driver.
>>
>> - chip->dev_read is only set if fun->dev_ready != NULL, which is
>> required for boards not connecting the R/B pin.
>>
>> - A few issue have been fixed with MxMR bit manipulation like in the
>> corresponding Linux driver.
>>
>> Note: I think the "io_addr" field of "struct fsl_upm" could be removed
>> as well, because the address is already determined by
>> "nand->IO_ADDR_[RW]", but I'm not 100% sure.
>>
>> This patch has been tested on a TQM8548 modules with the NAND chip
>> Micron MT29F8G08FABWP.
>>
>> This patch is based on the following patches posted to this list a few
>> minutes ago:
>>
>> [PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot
>> [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions
>>
>> Anton, could you please verify if it works on your MPC8360ERDK board as
>> well. A patch will follow. In principle, the NAND driver of the TQM8272
>> should work with it as well.
>
> Works great here (tested on MPC8360E-RDK). Thanks!
Great.
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>
> Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest
way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could pick them up directly?
Wolfgang.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
2008-06-02 13:02 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2008-06-02 15:03 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-02 19:32 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-06-02 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Monday 02 June 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
>
> All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest
> way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could pick them up directly?
No. I can't. Simply because it's not my responsibility anymore. :)
Scott Wood is now the custodian for NAND FLASH stuff. So he will probably pick
it up. Scott?
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
2008-06-02 15:03 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2008-06-02 19:32 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-04 10:31 ` Detlev Zundel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2008-06-02 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Monday 02 June 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>>> Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
>> All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest
>> way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could pick them up directly?
>
> No. I can't. Simply because it's not my responsibility anymore. :)
Ah, right, no I remember. At http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/Custodians
and http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=forks you are still listed as the
owner of u-boot-nand-flash.git.
> Scott Wood is now the custodian for NAND FLASH stuff. So he will
probably pick
> it up. Scott?
That would be nice.
Wolfgang.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
2008-06-02 19:32 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2008-06-04 10:31 ` Detlev Zundel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Detlev Zundel @ 2008-06-04 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
> Stefan Roese wrote:
>> On Monday 02 June 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
>>> All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest
>>> way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could pick them up directly?
>>
>> No. I can't. Simply because it's not my responsibility anymore. :)
>
> Ah, right, no I remember. At http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/Custodians
> and http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=forks you are still listed as the
> owner of u-boot-nand-flash.git.
At least the first is a wiki :-P
Anyway, changed.
Cheers
Detlev
--
We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not
admire it. The only excuse for making a useless thing is that one
admires it intensely.
--- Oscar Wilde
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
2008-06-02 10:11 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-02 11:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
@ 2008-06-02 22:12 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2008-06-02 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback
>
> This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal
> hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief
> list of furher modifications:
[snip]
> This patch is based on the following patches posted to this list a few
> minutes ago:
>
> [PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot
> [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions
[snip]
> /* yet only 8 bit accessors implemented */
> - if (fun->width != 1)
> + if (fun->width != 8 && fun->width != 16 && fun->width != 32)
The above comment looks like it should be removed.
Otherwise, Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Feel free to send via a powerpc tree due to the dependencies.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-04 10:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-02 10:11 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-02 11:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-02 13:02 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-02 15:03 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-02 19:32 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-06-04 10:31 ` Detlev Zundel
2008-06-02 22:12 ` Scott Wood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox