public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/8] New board SIMPC8313 support:	nand_boot.c, sdram.c, simpc8313.c
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:48:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602164835.GA3513@loki.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805311511.28106.sr@denx.de>

On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> One advantage of the current nand_spl subsystem is that it uses the same NAND 
> board/platform driver as the "normal", full blown U-Boot NAND subsystem does. 
> So there is no need to maintain multiple NAND drivers for one board/platform.

The elbc nand driver alone is over 4K, so that's not going to work.  It
could be cut down a bit by removing erase/program support, and only
supporting the page size present on the target hardware, but even then I'd
rather use the space for things like SPD-based SDRAM initialization.

> So again, please try to use the current nand_spl infrastructure. Or at least 
> explain why it doesn't work for you, so that we can work on these problems.

The NAND controller on the 8313 exposes a very different programming
interface than what nand_spl expects.  I don't think there's much that could
be re-used, other than the high-level functions like nand_load().

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-30 18:21 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/8] New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_boot.c, sdram.c, simpc8313.c Ron Madrid
2008-05-31 13:11 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-02 16:48   ` Scott Wood [this message]
2008-06-02 18:43     ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-02 19:06       ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080602164835.GA3513@loki.buserror.net \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox