From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:09:16 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading
	from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read'
	Succeeds)
In-Reply-To: <48446F0D.4030205@freescale.com>
References: <C469BC0E.F875%gerickson@nuovations.com>
	<48446F0D.4030205@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <200806030809.16342.sr@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
> Grant Erickson wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is
> > there any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I
> > erroneously chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e?
>
> I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved.  Does anyone
> actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands
> (intentionally, that is)?  If the answer is no, then we could make it
> the default.

I'm fine with making bad-block-skipping the default. I never used the "other" 
version and I don't know what it's really useful for.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================