From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use on-chip syscontrol() to reset
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:10:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806040610.21582.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2y75lbme1.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> In message vapier at gentoo.org you wrote:
> >> > When available, use the on-chip syscontrol() rom function to perform a
> >> > system reset rather than our own local method.
> >> > - asm("jump (%0);" : : "a" (bfin_reset));
> >> > + if (0 /*BOOTROM_CAPS_SYSCONTROL -- current silicon is broken*/)
> >> > + syscontrol(SYSCTRL_SOFTRESET, NULL, NULL);
> >> > + else
> >> > + asm("jump (%0);" : : "a" (bfin_reset));
> >> > }
> >>
> >> Your comment suggests you change something, but actually you;re just
> >> adding dead code.
> >
> > it's dead code because the current silicon is broken. i know the code
> > works as ive tested it in scenarios where the anomaly isnt triggered, it
> > just cant be enabled until fixed hardware is released. it's much easier
> > to go back and fix 1 if statement then have to carry this patch somewhere
> > it can got lost and i need to waste time and rewrite it.
>
> Hm. If the current - available - silicon is broken, then even if it is
> fixed in the future, you will have to support both versions, right? So
> in the end you will need to have a discriminating factor on what to use.
>
> So if you introduced some variable or bit in a variable (a define
> doesn't look promising as I guess you want to support both broken and
> non-broken silicon with a single image), you could have correct code now
> and in the future - and no dead code complaints.
there is already a Blackfin anomaly framework in place for this. we're just
awaiting for the anomaly to be formalized. that is what i meant when i
said "just update the if line".
> PowerPC Linux btw. does quite a lot of such "cpu_feature" stuff to
> dynamically accomodate lots of different silicon.
we dont do dynamic stuff like powerpc
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080604/14d68c7f/attachment.pgp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-01 5:38 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: dont call i2c_init() from board_init_r() Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: protect default flash according to CFG_MONITOR_LEN Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: update proc headers from toolchain Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: unify cache handling code Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use common memcpy routine during init Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: enable support for nested interrupts Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: respect CONFIG_CLKIN_HALF Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: setup a sane default EBIU_SDBCTL for SDRAM controllers Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use on-chip syscontrol() rom function when available Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use on-chip syscontrol() to reset Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 5:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: add support for BF538/BF539 Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-01 21:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 22:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-01 23:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-04 8:56 ` Detlev Zundel
2008-06-04 10:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-04 17:36 ` Detlev Zundel
2008-06-04 20:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-05 13:13 ` Detlev Zundel
2008-06-05 13:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-01 19:56 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use on-chip syscontrol() to reset Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-01 21:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 22:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-04 9:05 ` Detlev Zundel
2008-06-04 10:10 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2008-06-01 19:54 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: setup a sane default EBIU_SDBCTL for SDRAM controllers Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-01 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 21:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-01 22:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-06-01 19:47 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: protect default flash according to CFG_MONITOR_LEN Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806040610.21582.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox