From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:19:18 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading
	from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read'
	Succeeds)
In-Reply-To: <48446F0D.4030205@freescale.com>
References: <C469BC0E.F875%gerickson@nuovations.com>
	<48446F0D.4030205@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <200806040919.19222.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Scott,

we are using the NAND stuff for a couple of boards. All use the .i or .jffs2 extension.
So I also vote for making skipping the default. But the extensions should be preserved :-)

Matthias

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 00:07, Scott Wood wrote:
> Grant Erickson wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there
> > any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously
> > chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e?
> 
> I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved.  Does anyone 
> actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands 
> (intentionally, that is)?  If the answer is no, then we could make it 
> the default.
> 
> -Scott