From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080710131258.796c2e1b@siona.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080705230540.22A8C248AC@gemini.denx.de>
[removing my private e-mail address from Cc]
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:05:40 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> 2582 05/21 Haavard Skinnemoe [PATCH] MMC: Consolidate MMC/SD command definitions
> -> Rejected, needs to be rebased
I see you applied v2 instead -- good. Please ignore v1 as it was posted
before the big whitespace cleanup.
> 2584 05/21 Haavard Skinnemoe [PATCH] Remove kharris at nexus-tech.net from MAINTAINERS
> -> asked submitter for fixes / cleanup
I'll send you a new patch later today...if I can find the original
commit.
> 3648 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3649 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3650 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3651 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3652 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3653 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support
> 3654 06/11 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3733 06/12 "Ulf Samuelsson" Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3735 06/12 "COSTA, Antonio" Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3737 06/12 "Ulf Samuelsson" Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3739 06/12 Jerry Van Baren Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3859 06/15 Haavard Skinnemoe Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3897 06/16 Ken.Fuchs at bench.c Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3899 06/17 Haavard Skinnemoe Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB
> 3740 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (board folder)
> 3741 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 2)
> 3742 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 1)
> 3743 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (include files part 1)
> 3744 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 5/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (ethernet files)
> 3745 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (include files part 2)
> 3747 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (cpu folder)
> 3748 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (configuration files)
> 3746 06/12 "Antonio R. Costa [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] mmc_verbosity variable
> 3764 06/12 Haavard Skinnemoe Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 1)
> -> still under discussion; who is reponsible?
I think Jean-Christophe should be responsible for most of this, but I
obviously want to be kept in the loop with the MMC/SD/SDHC stuff and
possibly other stuff that is or ought to be shared with avr32.
Now that the MMC driver has been moved into drivers/mmc, I'd really
like to see a patch with the minimum amount of changes needed to make
the driver work on AT91 and AT57 as well. With that in place, we'll
have a great baseline to add new features like SDHC and MMC+ support,
and the rest of the AT57 board support can be merged independently.
Haavard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-05 23:05 [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-06 5:24 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2008-07-06 7:17 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-06 7:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-07 2:54 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-07 6:13 ` Ben Warren
2008-07-06 9:00 ` Magnus Lilja
2008-07-06 10:51 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-07-06 11:28 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-07 9:05 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-07 9:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-07 9:50 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-07 10:21 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-07 18:18 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-07 14:28 ` John Rigby
2008-07-07 15:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-07 14:32 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-07 18:23 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-07-07 18:55 ` Kim Phillips
2008-07-07 20:30 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-07-07 20:41 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-07-09 23:34 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2008-07-10 11:12 ` Haavard Skinnemoen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-09 19:46 Liew Tsi Chung
2008-07-09 21:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080710131258.796c2e1b@siona.local \
--to=haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox