From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:53:03 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] at91sam9: merge ether driver
	to	cpu_eth_init
In-Reply-To: <f8328f7c0807290724t3dffae86y7b0d094a601b364a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20080729090126.GB18666@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<1217329401-5017-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
	<f8328f7c0807290724t3dffae86y7b0d094a601b364a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080729145303.GC18666@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> Thanks.  This won't apply against the net/testing branch because I've
> already removed a bunch of the other initializations.  If you don't
> mind, I'll take care of this one along with many others in the coming
> few days.
Go ahead

> 
> Contradicting what I mentioned in another e-mail, this one does appear
> to make more sense as a cpu_eth_init, since all three (plus the new
> one) call only one MACB controller.  Not a strong opinion, though, so
> if anybody wants it as board_eth_init, speak up.
> 
Personnaly I prefer it in cpu_eth_init because it's cpu dependant not
board dependant

Best Regards,
J.