* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
@ 2008-07-30 10:42 Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado @ 2008-07-30 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@uam.es>
---
common/cmd_bdinfo.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
index caa467d..583bbc2 100644
--- a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
+++ b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int do_bdinfo ( cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
print_num ("bd address", (ulong)bd );
#endif
print_num ("memstart", bd->bi_memstart );
- print_lnum ("memsize", bd->bi_memsize );
+ print_num ("memsize", bd->bi_memsize );
print_num ("flashstart", bd->bi_flashstart );
print_num ("flashsize", bd->bi_flashsize );
print_num ("flashoffset", bd->bi_flashoffset );
--
1.5.6.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 10:42 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
@ 2008-07-30 11:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 11:10 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-07-30 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <1217414549-28700-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@uam.es> you wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@uam.es>
> ---
> common/cmd_bdinfo.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
> index caa467d..583bbc2 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int do_bdinfo ( cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
> print_num ("bd address", (ulong)bd );
> #endif
> print_num ("memstart", bd->bi_memstart );
> - print_lnum ("memsize", bd->bi_memsize );
> + print_num ("memsize", bd->bi_memsize );
> print_num ("flashstart", bd->bi_flashstart );
> print_num ("flashsize", bd->bi_flashsize );
> print_num ("flashoffset", bd->bi_flashoffset );
This patch is wrong. print_num() takes an ulong argument, but
bi_memsize has type phys_size_t.
Rejected.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"If you can, help others. If you can't, at least don't hurt others."
- the Dalai Lama
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-07-30 11:10 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado @ 2008-07-30 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello Wolfgang
My board has 0x10000000 bytes of memory, without this patch, bdinfo
shows 0x0 bytes of ram, but with this patch it shows the correct
amount... maybe the problem is in print_lnum
Best regards
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> In message <1217414549-28700-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@uam.es> you wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@uam.es>
>> ---
>> common/cmd_bdinfo.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
>> index caa467d..583bbc2 100644
>> --- a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
>> +++ b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int do_bdinfo ( cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
>> print_num ("bd address", (ulong)bd );
>> #endif
>> print_num ("memstart", bd->bi_memstart );
>> - print_lnum ("memsize", bd->bi_memsize );
>> + print_num ("memsize", bd->bi_memsize );
>> print_num ("flashstart", bd->bi_flashstart );
>> print_num ("flashsize", bd->bi_flashsize );
>> print_num ("flashoffset", bd->bi_flashoffset );
>
> This patch is wrong. print_num() takes an ulong argument, but
> bi_memsize has type phys_size_t.
>
> Rejected.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
> "If you can, help others. If you can't, at least don't hurt others."
> - the Dalai Lama
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:10 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
@ 2008-07-30 11:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 11:34 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-07-30 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <aa76a2be0807300410n33b5623ay8801cd7dd128b1a9@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> My board has 0x10000000 bytes of memory, without this patch, bdinfo
> shows 0x0 bytes of ram, but with this patch it shows the correct
> amount... maybe the problem is in print_lnum
It would be strange if this happened for your board only - I rather
suspect that you have a problem with your board configuration.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Every revolutionary idea - in science, politics, art, or whatever -
evokes three stages of reaction in a hearer:
1. It is completely impossible - don't waste my time.
2. It is possible, but it is not worth doing.
3. I said it was a good idea all along.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-07-30 11:34 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado @ 2008-07-30 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello Wolfwang
I don't think that it is a problem with my board config, otherwhise
it won't show the correct size using print_num...
Maybe other users didn't have any problems because their memory
size is smaller than 256MB.
Best regards
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> In message <aa76a2be0807300410n33b5623ay8801cd7dd128b1a9@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> My board has 0x10000000 bytes of memory, without this patch, bdinfo
>> shows 0x0 bytes of ram, but with this patch it shows the correct
>> amount... maybe the problem is in print_lnum
>
> It would be strange if this happened for your board only - I rather
> suspect that you have a problem with your board configuration.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
> Every revolutionary idea - in science, politics, art, or whatever -
> evokes three stages of reaction in a hearer:
> 1. It is completely impossible - don't waste my time.
> 2. It is possible, but it is not worth doing.
> 3. I said it was a good idea all along.
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:34 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
@ 2008-07-30 11:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 12:08 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Stefan Roese
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-07-30 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <aa76a2be0807300434o332c9da8gaa2e7e3d4486dd64@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> I don't think that it is a problem with my board config, otherwhise
> it won't show the correct size using print_num...
> Maybe other users didn't have any problems because their memory
> size is smaller than 256MB.
There are many, many boards with bigger memory as well. And these
don't have problems either. For example:
U-Boot 1.3.4-rc1-00012-g1953d12 (Jul 21 2008 - 09:05:23)
CPU: AMCC PowerPC 440SPe Rev. B at 800 MHz (PLB=160, OPB=53, EBC=17 MHz)
RAID 6 support
Bootstrap Option D - Boot ROM Location I2C (Addr 0x50)
Internal PCI arbiter enabled
32 kB I-Cache 32 kB D-Cache
Board: Katmai - AMCC 440SPe Evaluation Board
I2C: ready
DTT: 1 is 27 C
DTT: 2 is 27 C
DRAM: 4 GB (ECC not enabled, 640 MHz, CL5)
FLASH: 16 MB
...
=> bdi
memstart = 0x00000000
memsize = 0x100000000
...
As you can see, this board has 4 GB of RAM and everything works just
fine.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
If you fail to plan, plan to fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:34 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-07-30 11:54 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 12:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <aa76a2be0809011227t642d7460h9178efef2f1443d6@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-07-30 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Ricardo,
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> I don't think that it is a problem with my board config, otherwhise
> it won't show the correct size using print_num...
> Maybe other users didn't have any problems because their memory
> size is smaller than 256MB.
Most likely you need to enable 64bit printf format (%ll) support:
#define CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF
#define CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL
This is already done for all 440 PPC's (include/ppc4xx.h) in the current git
head. I'll merge this soon into the next branch of my ppc4xx repository, then
your problem should go away.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-07-30 12:08 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-07-30 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> => bdi
> memstart = 0x00000000
> memsize = 0x100000000
> ...
>
> As you can see, this board has 4 GB of RAM and everything works just
> fine.
Yes. But unfortunately not for all boards. As it seems the patch
b57ca3e128cc10a133ba79bc7ec3e7b50e7c8fbe [Change bd/gd memsize/ram_size to be
phys_size_t.] introduced %llX unconditionally for all non-ARM boards. And
many boards don't have support for 64bit printf formats enabled.
So what to do? Enable 64bit format on all boards? Or make this size printing
conditionally somehow?
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2008-07-30 12:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 12:13 ` Stefan Roese
[not found] ` <aa76a2be0809011227t642d7460h9178efef2f1443d6@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-07-30 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <200807301354.50242.sr@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > I don't think that it is a problem with my board config, otherwhise
> > it won't show the correct size using print_num...
> > Maybe other users didn't have any problems because their memory
> > size is smaller than 256MB.
>
> Most likely you need to enable 64bit printf format (%ll) support:
>
> #define CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF
> #define CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL
>
> This is already done for all 440 PPC's (include/ppc4xx.h) in the current git
> head. I'll merge this soon into the next branch of my ppc4xx repository, then
> your problem should go away.
Given the fact that print_lnum() unconditionally takes a u64 arg and
unconditionally uses a %llX format, I thinkwe shoudl either fix
print_lnum() for non-64bit cases, or drop the CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF /
CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL options completely.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
If God had a beard, he'd be a UNIX programmer.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 12:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-07-30 12:13 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 12:27 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info aboutmemory size Ricardo
2008-07-31 9:11 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-07-30 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Most likely you need to enable 64bit printf format (%ll) support:
> >
> > #define CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF
> > #define CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL
> >
> > This is already done for all 440 PPC's (include/ppc4xx.h) in the current
> > git head. I'll merge this soon into the next branch of my ppc4xx
> > repository, then your problem should go away.
>
> Given the fact that print_lnum() unconditionally takes a u64 arg and
> unconditionally uses a %llX format, I thinkwe shoudl either fix
> print_lnum() for non-64bit cases, or drop the CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF /
> CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL options completely.
Personally, I'm voting for dropping the options completely and enabling the
64bit support unconditionally. I took me some time a few days ago to figure
out that this support was *not* enabled by default.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info aboutmemory size
2008-07-30 12:13 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2008-07-30 12:27 ` Ricardo
2008-07-31 9:11 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo @ 2008-07-30 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello WD and SR:
because my board is one that it is not working, I am open to receive
any snipset and test them on the "real world"
Best Regards
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > Most likely you need to enable 64bit printf format (%ll) support:
>> >
>> > #define CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF
>> > #define CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL
>> >
>> > This is already done for all 440 PPC's (include/ppc4xx.h) in the current
>> > git head. I'll merge this soon into the next branch of my ppc4xx
>> > repository, then your problem should go away.
>>
>> Given the fact that print_lnum() unconditionally takes a u64 arg and
>> unconditionally uses a %llX format, I thinkwe shoudl either fix
>> print_lnum() for non-64bit cases, or drop the CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF /
>> CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL options completely.
>
> Personally, I'm voting for dropping the options completely and enabling the
> 64bit support unconditionally. I took me some time a few days ago to figure
> out that this support was *not* enabled by default.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
>
> =====================================================================
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
> =====================================================================
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
2008-07-30 12:13 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 12:27 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info aboutmemory size Ricardo
@ 2008-07-31 9:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-07-31 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <200807301413.32008.sr@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > Given the fact that print_lnum() unconditionally takes a u64 arg and
> > unconditionally uses a %llX format, I thinkwe shoudl either fix
> > print_lnum() for non-64bit cases, or drop the CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF /
> > CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL options completely.
>
> Personally, I'm voting for dropping the options completely and enabling the
> 64bit support unconditionally. I took me some time a few days ago to figure
> out that this support was *not* enabled by default.
Well, it adds some 2.2 kB of code size for all ssytems - even those
who have zero benefit from it.
My personal preference would be to fix print_lnum() to take for
example a phys_size_t argument instead of u64.
I guess we need an #ifdef for the %llX (versus %lX) format then (or
does anybody know of a clever way to avoid this, maybe something like
the %zu we used to fix the size_t issues? )
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
No more blah, blah, blah!
-- Kirk, "Miri", stardate 2713.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Fwd: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size
[not found] ` <aa76a2be0809011227t642d7460h9178efef2f1443d6@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-09-01 19:28 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado @ 2008-09-01 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
For the record:
What Stefan says is completely true. Last version of u-boot does not
give wrong info without my patch.
Regards
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:54, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> Ricardo,
>
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>> I don't think that it is a problem with my board config, otherwhise
>> it won't show the correct size using print_num...
>> Maybe other users didn't have any problems because their memory
>> size is smaller than 256MB.
>
> Most likely you need to enable 64bit printf format (%ll) support:
>
> #define CFG_64BIT_VSPRINTF
> #define CFG_64BIT_STRTOUL
>
> This is already done for all 440 PPC's (include/ppc4xx.h) in the current git
> head. I'll merge this soon into the next branch of my ppc4xx repository, then
> your problem should go away.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
>
> =====================================================================
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
> =====================================================================
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-01 19:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-30 10:42 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 11:10 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 11:34 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 12:08 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 11:54 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 12:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-07-30 12:13 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-30 12:27 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info aboutmemory size Ricardo
2008-07-31 9:11 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bdinfo not showing correct info about memory size Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <aa76a2be0809011227t642d7460h9178efef2f1443d6@mail.gmail.com>
2008-09-01 19:28 ` [U-Boot] Fwd: " Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox