From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] IOMUX: Add console multiplexing support.
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:46:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080915104647.79c73006@peedub.jennejohn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080914183427.3502C24885@gemini.denx.de>
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:34:27 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> In message <20080914191918.7de10c5c@peedub.jennejohn.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > 2) You only add new points where the GD_FLG_DEVINIT bit gets set in
> > > gd->flags. That means there are two possibilities when your newly
> > > added code is run: either, this bit is already set by other parts of
> > > the codem than the operation was redundant and couldbe omitted; or,
> > > the flasg was not set yet, then you set it now, which means you set it
> > > EARLIE than it would have been set before.
> > >
> > > But your comment suggests that that would be done LATER now.
> > >
> > >
> > > So what exactly is the purpose of this patch?
> >
> > This bit is normally ser in console_init_r, which is called very early.
> >
> > You have to look at this patch in conjunction with the first patch and
> > not as a separate entity, which it most definitely is not.
>
> Sorry, but this doesn't work. If you split patches, you have to do it
> in an orthogoanl way, such that each patch on it's own makes sense.
> This patch doesn't make any sense as is. Maybe theree are parts
> missing that may be buried somewhere in some other patch, but please
> do not expect that we will try to find them.
>
> Please re-split patches such that they are independent of each other
> (except maybe that one has to be applied first), and make sure that
> each patch is complete in itself.
>
I did it this way because I didn't want to send the net custodian
an unnecessary patch. I though that was the way patches were supposed
to be handled. I know I've had complaints from custodians in the
past about this.
A consistent policy certainly would be nice.
---
Gary Jennejohn
*********************************************************************
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
*********************************************************************
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-15 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-14 14:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] IOMUX: Add console multiplexing support Gary Jennejohn
2008-09-14 16:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-09-14 17:19 ` Gary Jennejohn
2008-09-14 18:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-09-15 8:46 ` Gary Jennejohn [this message]
2008-09-15 11:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-20 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V2] " Gary Jennejohn
2008-10-20 13:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-20 13:57 ` Gary Jennejohn
2008-10-20 16:26 ` Gary Jennejohn
2008-10-20 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-20 20:13 ` Ben Warren
2008-10-21 9:45 ` Gary Jennejohn
2008-10-21 10:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-21 11:32 ` Gary Jennejohn
2008-10-20 19:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080915104647.79c73006@peedub.jennejohn.org \
--to=garyj@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox