From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH PPC_4xx V3] Print simple row of dots instead of spinning wheel
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:09:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810311009.47348.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081031084554.2A80C874DB9E@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
On Friday 31 October 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Of course the end result looks better. There is no doubt about that.
> But it has disadvantages, too. With the row of dots you can easily
> see how long you've been waiting - this visualizes variations in
> timing behaviour that may be indications for problems; also it
> clearly shows where we have to wait too long, i. e. where optimi-
> zations are needed.
>
> > I understand that the spinning wheel is not optimal for logfiles, but for
> > the normal usage it just looks nicer for my taste. So I would prefer to
> > stay with the spinning wheel, but if you decide that the 4xx DDR2
> > calibration mustn't use this, then let's apply your patch for the
> > cpu/ppc4xx files.
>
> It is my understanding that a rework of this code is under way which
> will avoid the long delay for the standard boot sequence (and only
> need it for board bringup or intentional recalibration).
Are you talking about storing the optimized autocalibration values in FLASH,
as discussed on IRC some time ago? I don't know if somebody is working on
this. I only know that AMCC is working on a fix for the autocalibration on
Kilauea. Not sure if this effects the bootup time, I can only hope it does.
> For this
> purpose, the row of dots is IMHO more useful than the spinning wheel.
>
> Assuming my understanding is correct (is it?), then we could fix this
> now as well.
Again, if you decide that that's the way to go, then I will not object.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 10:59 [U-Boot] [PATCH PPC_4xx V3] Print simple row of dots instead of spinning wheel Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-23 11:08 ` Stefan Roese
2008-10-23 11:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-28 23:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-27 14:18 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-10-30 23:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 7:54 ` Stefan Roese
2008-10-31 8:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 9:09 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2008-10-31 11:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 12:06 ` Stefan Roese
2008-10-31 12:41 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810311009.47348.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox