From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: Make all flash access functions weak
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:45:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811170945.38488.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081113091852.6dcef4cf@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>
On Thursday 13 November 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> > This patch defines all flash access functions as weak so that
> > they can be overridden by board specific versions.
> >
> > This will be used by the upcoming VCTH board support where the NOR
> > FLASH unfortunately can't be accessed memory-mapped. Special
> > accessor functions are needed here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>
> How much overhead does this add? Those things used to be trivial
> inlines, but can't be if you turn them into weak aliases.
Here the difference for a PPC4xx board (Kilauea):
Old version without weak aliases:
text data bss dec hex filename
280964 20232 50788 351984 55ef0 ./u-boot
New version with weak aliases:
text data bss dec hex filename
280520 20232 50788 351540 55d34 ./u-boot
So the difference is 444 bytes (with gcc 4.2.2). I have to admit that this is
more than I thought. If necessary I could make this weak change conditionally
of course. I just didn't want to "pollute" to the source with more #ifdef's.
Any comments?
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-17 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 12:31 [U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: Make all flash access functions weak Stefan Roese
2008-11-13 8:18 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-11-17 8:45 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2008-11-17 8:54 ` Stefan Roese
2008-11-17 9:01 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-11-17 9:34 ` Stefan Roese
2008-11-17 9:40 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-11-17 9:49 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811170945.38488.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox