From: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ne2000: take MAC address from config if available
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:39:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081214113910.GA8678@buzzloop.caiaq.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081214111224.185CB832E8A1@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:12:24PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > This adds CONFIG_NE2000_NOPROM. If set, the ethernet MAC address is taken
> > from the environment variable 'ethaddr' and the NIC is configured
> > accordingly. Needed for boards that don't have an EEPROM to store this
> > setting permanently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> >
> > ---
> > ne2000_base.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Why do we need a special CONFIG_ option? is it not possible to detect
> (by software) that there is no EEPROM available, and auto-adjust?
Hmm, what's bad about a special config variable? I agree that in
general, auto-probing is a good thing, but in U-Boot with its per-board
configuration file concept, I don't see much advantage. It is very
unlikely that a certain board is produced with and without an EEPROM.
> Note that there is existing policy how to handle the situation that
> we have both a MAC address stored in some other storeage (like EEPROM
> on the NIC) and in the "ethaddr" environment variable (see for
> example drivers/net/cs8900.c). In the end, the code shall always only
> rely on the U-Boot environment settings.
I can send a new version of this patch following this, but I wonder
why such a logic has to be implemented in the ethernet drivers and did
not find a well-defined place in some kind of layer all drivers make use
of? Wouldn't it make more sense to put some effort in this direction?
Best regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-14 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-28 16:16 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ne2000: take MAC address from config if available Daniel Mack
2008-11-29 5:27 ` Ben Warren
2008-11-29 13:17 ` Daniel Mack
2008-12-03 1:01 ` Daniel Mack
2008-12-14 11:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-14 11:39 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2009-01-27 13:09 ` Daniel Mack
2009-01-27 13:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081214113910.GA8678@buzzloop.caiaq.de \
--to=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox