[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] Code Clean-up (weak functions)

[Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>]

On Monday 22 December 2008 04:16:33 Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 December 2008 00:26:26 Graeme Russ wrote:
> >> This patch makes all definitions, declarations and usages of weak
> >> functions consistent.
> >
> > a quick glance shows that it breaks things (the ELF and Blackfin stuff
> > certainly appears to be wrong).  i'm guessing you focused on style for
> > the RFC part rather than the result actually being correct ...
> > -mike
>
> Thanks for having a look at this. Would it be possible for you to be a bit
> more specific about 'wrong' if for nothing other that me gaining a better
> understanding of how it works, and how it breaks

you set the aliases to functions that do not exist
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20081222/9561f07d/attachment.pgp