From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fat: fix unaligned errors
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:48:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090102234850.611588387CDB@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901021742.05363.vapier@gentoo.org>
Dear Mike,
In message <200901021742.05363.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > > +__u8 get_vfatname_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE] __attribute__
> > > ((aligned(sizeof(__u16))));
> > ...
> > > +__u8 get_dentfromdir_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE] __attribute__
> > > ((aligned(sizeof(__u32))));
> > ...
> > > +__u8 do_fat_read_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE] __attribute__
> > > ((aligned(sizeof(__u32))));
> >
> > What makes you sure that a 16 resp. 32 bit alignment is sufficient,
> > and that gcc does not decide to align such structures even stricter?
>
> read the structures in question. the largest member is 16bit/32bit. i really
> dont know what other alignment gcc could randomly generate.
It is not (only) the size of the "largest" member in a struct which
determins global alignment, but also the size of the struct itself.
See for example
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Type-Attributes.html
Read especially this part:
In the example above, if the size of each short is 2 bytes,
then the size of the entire struct S type is 6 bytes. The
smallest power of two which is greater than or equal to that
is 8, so the compiler sets the alignment for the entire struct
S type to 8 bytes.
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to use "__alignof__ ()" here to be on the
> > safe side?
>
> i found no such alignment attribute in the gcc docs which is why i suggested
> Bryan use aligned(sizeof(...)).
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Variable-Attributes.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Type-Attributes.html
Maybe you should have searched for the (IMHO pretty obvious) term
"Alignment" as well, i.e. look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Alignment.html#Alignment
Quote:
The keyword __alignof__ allows you to inquire about how an
object is aligned, or the minimum alignment usually required
by a type. Its syntax is just like sizeof.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The more sins you confess, the more books you will sell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-02 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-02 0:54 [U-Boot] [PATCH] fat: fix unaligned errors Mike Frysinger
2009-01-02 9:32 ` Remy Bohmer
2009-01-02 10:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-01-02 22:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-02 22:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-01-02 23:48 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2009-01-03 1:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-01-03 1:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Mike Frysinger
2009-01-24 1:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090102234850.611588387CDB@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox