From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:24:22 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263 In-Reply-To: <19983744.28497.1231968638262.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> References: <8636714.19078.1231931182670.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice3.nsc.no> <3efb10970901141053r26ae3540i87e0ddb76d9bc3ef@mail.gmail.com> <19983744.28497.1231968638262.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> Message-ID: <20090114212422.GA8288@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 22:30 Wed 14 Jan , Paal Bakken wrote: > I have testet a lot more and have found the following: > > 1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result... > > 2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with linux fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 partition. This variant worked without any problems in u-boot. (the multiple partitions seems to be typical from the vendors) > > 3. Then I took the USB 2.0 stick (from the trace in my first mail) and did the same repartioning with fdisk. But this stick still gives the same bad result :-( > > So???? > > Are there any known limitations/requirements to the u-boot USB implementation? > -USB1.0 vs USB2.0 > -How to partition the stick (if the original partition can't be used) > -Other > > ...and once more: the USB 2.0 stick works fine in linux.... I'll take a look on my 9263ek but I've test recently a 4GB usb 2.0 key on the at91rm9200ek with any problem btw please limit your mail at 80chars per line Best Regards, J.