[U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313

Ron Madrid
2009-01-23T23:36:40Z

--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Ron Madrid <ron_madrid@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> From: Ron Madrid <ron_madrid@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
> To: "Kim Phillips" <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:29 PM
> --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips
> <kim.phillips@freescale.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +ENTRY(_start)
> > > > > +ASSERT(_end <= 0xfff01000,
> "NAND
> > bootstrap
> > > > too big");
> > > >
> > > > Ron, the above gets asserted when building
> for
> > large page
> > > > nand with a
> > > > gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain:
> > >
> > > Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go
> about
> > fixing this? How do I
> > > determine my toolchain and how can I use the same
> one
> > you are referring to?
> > > Are there any documents that can point me in the
> right
> > direction?
> >
> > I'm just using what Fedora brought to me on my G5
> box
> > (native
> > compiler). I still use it because it's close to
> what
> > the ELDK version
> > is (or used to be - I can't immediately tell which
> > version the ELDK is
> > using right now). Where/when did you get your
> toolchain?
>
> I am using the one that came with FC4. I'm guessing
> that I should go ahead
> an update my gcc. I'm in the middle of doing that.
> I'll get back to you
> if I discover anything and then of course I'll
> resubmit.

I upgraded my gcc and did not see any difference in the builds. I'm not sure where to go from here.

Ron