From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:24:23 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 27/27] remove bi_enet*addr from global data for
	all arches
In-Reply-To: <20090216194900.ca284a3f.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
References: <1234596190-524-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>
	<200902161918.21292.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<20090216194900.ca284a3f.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <200902162224.24752.vapier@gentoo.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Monday 16 February 2009 20:49:00 Kim Phillips wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > renamed, things will appear to "just work".  so there is no way for them
> > to know that they need to fix their code which means they wont. 
> > otherwise, people hitting a build failure will know immediately that they
> > need to update something.
>
> there's also #warning for this type of situation, but I agree with
> adding glaring comments in the code.

#warning's wont help as there's no way to take it onto a member of a struct 
(unless there's something i'm not aware of), plus the common ppc code 
explicitly set it all the time and we dont want to have that trigger a warning
-mike