From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:22:44 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb
In-Reply-To: <3efb10970904010025u5ea748c3w8be6990f8527ea66@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1238193026-12564-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
	<20090331192117.GF24923@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<20090331203822.60DED83797DC@gemini.denx.de>
	<200904010855.55698.sr@denx.de>
	<3efb10970904010025u5ea748c3w8be6990f8527ea66@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090401072244.GA23893@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 09:25 Wed 01 Apr     , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
> 
> > From what I remember we all agreed to move the device drivers (e.g. ethernet,
> > NAND, USB, serial etc) from the architecture/board (cpu/... board/...) to the
> > drivers directories at some time.
> >
> > Speaking for PPC4xx, the 4xx ethernet driver has recently been moved from
> > cpu/ppc4xx to drivers/net. And I'm planning to move the 4xx NAND driver (and
> > others) soon too.
> >
> > So if this atmel_usb.c driver isn't just platform USB init code, but a real
> > USB driver, then I'm voting to move it to drivers/usb as well.
> 
> And that is exactly the issue here. The discussion is about moving
> 'platform USB init code' to generic driver code.
> I would have no problems with moving real USB drivers to the generic
> driver section, if they are cleaned from board specific code, of
> course.
in our case it's not a cpu specify init but an IP init which is share to
multiple soc for multiple arch

Best Regards,
J.