From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:13:50 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13] at91: move usb driver to drivers/usb
In-Reply-To: <3efb10970904010057k1e7b3759k2b24ad483af96ae5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1238193026-12564-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
	<20090331192117.GF24923@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<20090331203822.60DED83797DC@gemini.denx.de>
	<200904010855.55698.sr@denx.de>
	<3efb10970904010025u5ea748c3w8be6990f8527ea66@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090401072244.GA23893@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<3efb10970904010057k1e7b3759k2b24ad483af96ae5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090401081350.GC23893@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 09:57 Wed 01 Apr     , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello Jean-Christophe,
> 
> >> And that is exactly the issue here. The discussion is about moving
> >> 'platform USB init code' to generic driver code.
> >> I would have no problems with moving real USB drivers to the generic
> >> driver section, if they are cleaned from board specific code, of
> >> course.
> > in our case it's not a cpu specify init but an IP init which is share to
> > multiple soc for multiple arch
> 
> IMHO, that still does not justify it to make it part of the generic drivers.
> And I already mentioned yesterday, that I agree that it does not
> really belong in the cpu section as well.
> We should not pollute one area by cleaning another area.
> 
> So, we seem to be lacking a SoC/board specific section, like the linux
> kernel handles it.
btw in linux the similar usb code is here
drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c

Best Regards,
J.