public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:44:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417054459.GL31923@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904121544.23683.david-b@pacbell.net>

On 15:44 Sun 12 Apr     , David Brownell wrote:
> From: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> 
> Start updating DaVinci board support to reduce dependencies on
> dm644x chips and EVM-like boards ... beginning with "psc.c",
> which hosts a bunch of those dependencies:
> 
>  - Pinmux registers and their contents are SoC-specific, and
>    are also unrelated to the Power and Sleep Controller.
>    
>      * Declare more of the pinmux registers;
>      * Move their bitfield decls to a public header;
>      * Renaming thse bitfields to be clearly SoC-specific.
> 
>  - Rename the errata workarounds to be clearly SoC-specific.
> 
>  - Add a CONFIG_SOC_DM6446; use it to prevent some mux goofs.
> 
>  - Don't include the I2C support if the I2C driver is not enabled.
> 
> Plus two minor bugfixes:
> 
>  - Correct the PSC_MDSTAT mask ...  it's six bits, not five.
>    (Original DM6446 doces said five, FWIW.)
> 
>  - Correct the PWREMU_MGT mask ... don't set must-be-zero bits.
> 
> The simplest always-correct way to handle pinmux is in board_init()
> calls; or possibly in SoC-specific device setup code.  Currently
> these chips don't have such SoC-specific support.
could you split it in more logical change please
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  board/davinci/common/psc.c              |   29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  board/davinci/common/psc.h              |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/dvevm/dvevm.c             |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/schmoogie/schmoogie.c     |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/sffsdr/sffsdr.c           |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/sonata/sonata.c           |    2 +-
>  include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/hardware.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/configs/davinci_dvevm.h         |    1 +
>  include/configs/davinci_schmoogie.h     |    1 +
>  include/configs/davinci_sffsdr.h        |    1 +
>  include/configs/davinci_sonata.h        |    1 +
>  11 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/board/davinci/common/psc.c
> +++ b/board/davinci/common/psc.c
> @@ -26,13 +26,6 @@
>  #include <common.h>
>  #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
>  
> -#define PINMUX0_EMACEN (1 << 31)
> -#define PINMUX0_AECS5  (1 << 11)
> -#define PINMUX0_AECS4  (1 << 10)
> -
> -#define PINMUX1_I2C    (1 <<  7)
> -#define PINMUX1_UART1  (1 <<  1)
> -#define PINMUX1_UART0  (1 <<  0)
>  
>  /*
>   * The DM6446 includes two separate power domains: "Always On" and "DSP". The
> @@ -57,7 +50,7 @@ void lpsc_on(unsigned int id)
>  
>  	while (REG(PSC_PTSTAT) & 0x01);
>  
> -	if ((*mdstat & 0x1f) == 0x03)
> +	if ((*mdstat & 0x3f) == 0x03)
>  		return;			/* Already on and enabled */
>  
>  	*mdctl |= 0x03;
> @@ -129,10 +122,12 @@ void davinci_enable_uart0(void)
>  	lpsc_on(DAVINCI_LPSC_UART0);
>  
>  	/* Bringup UART0 out of reset */
> -	REG(UART0_PWREMU_MGMT) = 0x0000e003;
> +	REG(UART0_PWREMU_MGMT) = 0x00006001;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM6446
>  	/* Enable UART0 MUX lines */
> -	REG(PINMUX1) |= PINMUX1_UART0;
> +	REG(PINMUX1) |= DM644X_PINMUX1_UART0;
is this the same for all DM6446?
and the same question for the I2C and EMAC

it will be better to init pio/mux in devices file without redefined it in the
board as done for the at91

Best Regards,
J.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-17  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-12 22:44 [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips David Brownell
2009-04-17  5:44 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2009-04-17  6:31   ` David Brownell
2009-04-17  7:28     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-18 21:00       ` David Brownell
2009-04-24 16:24     ` Hugo Villeneuve
2009-04-24 19:33       ` David Brownell
2009-04-24 21:45         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-24 22:40           ` David Brownell
2009-04-25  5:17             ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: " Dirk Behme
2009-04-25  6:27               ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25  7:03                 ` David Brownell
2009-04-25  7:18                   ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25  8:05                     ` David Brownell
2009-04-25 10:48                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 11:40                         ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 12:55                         ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy David Brownell
2009-04-25 13:53                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 18:53                             ` David Brownell
2009-04-26 21:38                               ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-27 13:44                         ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips Jerry Van Baren
2009-04-27 14:00                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 10:30                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25  7:07                 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy Dirk Behme
2009-04-25  7:42                   ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25 10:46                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 11:35                       ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 13:44                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-27 15:47                           ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-27 19:42                             ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-28  8:32                               ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-28  9:07                                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 16:13                       ` Ben Warren
2009-04-26  5:15                       ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 10:41                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 17:08                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-25 17:30                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 18:02                       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-25 18:55                     ` David Brownell
2009-04-25  6:57               ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips David Brownell
2009-04-25  7:11                 ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-24 23:46           ` [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] " Ben Warren
2009-04-25  0:36             ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090417054459.GL31923@game.jcrosoft.org \
    --to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox