[U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

[Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>]

On Sunday 19 April 2009 15:50:46 Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > so, does it make sense to look at the feature set that v2 brings to
> > the table and get it into u-boot v1? ive never personally looked at
> > v2, but if it means i need to redo all of my Blackfin core/board code,
> > that doesnt sound very appealing at all ...
>
> We have even Blackfin support in v2, and that for almost all of the time
> it is actually there. Sure - if you need feature completeness, you'll
> have to stay with v1. Our aim is a sane design, and I'm still not
> convinced that this is even possible with v1 any more.

unless it's the code that ive been committing to mainline via the blackfin git 
tree, then it really doesnt matter (and it looks that way) since, as you say, 
it is not even close to feature parity.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20090420/e38f54be/attachment.pgp