From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:42:08 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] =?iso-8859-15?q?=5BANNOUNCE=5D=A0Kconfig_support?= In-Reply-To: <20090420140414.GQ5367@pengutronix.de> References: <20090418162530.GD1413@game.jcrosoft.org> <200904200949.40732.vapier@gentoo.org> <20090420140414.GQ5367@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <200904201042.10253.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday 20 April 2009 10:04:14 Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:49:38AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > If you aim for feature completeness, use v1 and don't care about v2. > > > v2 is for people who care about *design*. > > > > so v2 is good for thinking about things while v1 is good for people > > who want to do real work. if that's the standpoint, then it looks > > like v2 is destined to die and ideas should be fitted onto v1. > > Well, it is Open Source, so you are free to do whatever you want to do. > > U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it isn't what > you need, it is perfectly fine if you ignore it. my concern isnt really narrow to the Blackfin port. i was using it as a practical example. we've talked about v2 in the past as the answer to many of our problems and so we dont bother doing it in v1. but that approach looks to be wrong as v2 is of little practical importance. instead we should be doing what Jean-Christophe is doing: poaching good ideas until we get to the point where v2 can simply die. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20090420/8f6d24b2/attachment-0001.pgp