public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:56:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904261656.40151.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090426225722.GN32215@game.jcrosoft.org>

On Sunday 26 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> 
> > > > Before I submit a patch to remove it from U-Boot GIT (nothing
> > > > there enables it, and it will nastify 4-bit support), I thought
> > > > I'd see if anyone knows exactly what software it was trying to
> > > > emulate. ?...
> > >
> > > maybe add it in the feature-removal-schedule.txt
> > > will let people time to explain why they need it
> > 
> > Hm... I don't think this is needed.
> > 
> > Since there are no users of this code in U-Boot, we can as well
> > remove it without warning.

That was my thought.  If it were important enough to keep in
*this* source base, someone would have submitted some board
that uses it.  It's badly enough broken that I don't know who
would bother using it, though; anyone trying to use it has some
kind of (non-Linux?) support nightmare already.


> no necessarelly the boards Maintainer choose to use the other ECC but part
> of the U-Boot user may need it.
> So add it in the removal schedule make sense. We can evenif plan it for the next
> Release.

I wouldn't mind doing that.


> > > After my only request will be to use the same ECC as the mainline kernel
> > > or if someone explain why he need it add on other ECC algo

Right, mainline does not use that "broken" ECC.  I can't
figure out who *does* use it, either...

- Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-26 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-26 18:11 [U-Boot] U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC David Brownell
2009-04-26 22:40 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-26 22:51   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-26 22:57     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-26 23:56       ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-04-27  2:08         ` Hugo Villeneuve
2009-04-27 18:56     ` Scott Wood
2009-04-27 19:46       ` David Brownell
2009-04-27 20:11         ` Scott Wood
2009-04-27 21:16           ` David Brownell
2009-05-04  0:39 ` Stephen Irons
2009-05-04  2:44   ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904261656.40151.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox