From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:56:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904261656.40151.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090426225722.GN32215@game.jcrosoft.org>
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>
> > > > Before I submit a patch to remove it from U-Boot GIT (nothing
> > > > there enables it, and it will nastify 4-bit support), I thought
> > > > I'd see if anyone knows exactly what software it was trying to
> > > > emulate. ?...
> > >
> > > maybe add it in the feature-removal-schedule.txt
> > > will let people time to explain why they need it
> >
> > Hm... I don't think this is needed.
> >
> > Since there are no users of this code in U-Boot, we can as well
> > remove it without warning.
That was my thought. If it were important enough to keep in
*this* source base, someone would have submitted some board
that uses it. It's badly enough broken that I don't know who
would bother using it, though; anyone trying to use it has some
kind of (non-Linux?) support nightmare already.
> no necessarelly the boards Maintainer choose to use the other ECC but part
> of the U-Boot user may need it.
> So add it in the removal schedule make sense. We can evenif plan it for the next
> Release.
I wouldn't mind doing that.
> > > After my only request will be to use the same ECC as the mainline kernel
> > > or if someone explain why he need it add on other ECC algo
Right, mainline does not use that "broken" ECC. I can't
figure out who *does* use it, either...
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-26 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-26 18:11 [U-Boot] U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC David Brownell
2009-04-26 22:40 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-26 22:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-26 22:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-26 23:56 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-04-27 2:08 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2009-04-27 18:56 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-27 19:46 ` David Brownell
2009-04-27 20:11 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-27 21:16 ` David Brownell
2009-05-04 0:39 ` Stephen Irons
2009-05-04 2:44 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904261656.40151.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox