* [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset
@ 2009-05-16 12:27 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-05-19 22:31 ` Scott Wood
2009-06-22 20:29 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2009-05-16 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
nand_init currently use size_t which is arch dependent and not always a
unsigned long. Now use loff_t as the linux mtd layer
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
include/nand.h | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
index 6ba52b3..dc7eacd 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, int tight)
* NAND_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCK: page unlocked
*
*/
-int nand_get_lock_status(struct mtd_info *mtd, ulong offset)
+int nand_get_lock_status(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offset)
{
int ret = 0;
int chipnr;
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, ulong start, ulong length)
* @param length image length
* @return image length including bad blocks
*/
-static size_t get_len_incl_bad (nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset,
+static size_t get_len_incl_bad (nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset,
const size_t length)
{
size_t len_incl_bad = 0;
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static size_t get_len_incl_bad (nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset,
* @param buf buffer to read from
* @return 0 in case of success
*/
-int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
+int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
u_char *buffer)
{
int rval;
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
if (len_incl_bad == *length) {
rval = nand_write (nand, offset, length, buffer);
if (rval != 0)
- printf ("NAND write to offset %zx failed %d\n",
+ printf ("NAND write to offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
return rval;
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
size_t write_size;
if (nand_block_isbad (nand, offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1))) {
- printf ("Skip bad block 0x%08zx\n",
+ printf ("Skip bad block 0x%08llx\n",
offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1));
offset += nand->erasesize - block_offset;
continue;
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
rval = nand_write (nand, offset, &write_size, p_buffer);
if (rval != 0) {
- printf ("NAND write to offset %zx failed %d\n",
+ printf ("NAND write to offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
*length -= left_to_write;
return rval;
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
* @param buffer buffer to write to
* @return 0 in case of success
*/
-int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
+int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
u_char *buffer)
{
int rval;
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
if (len_incl_bad == *length) {
rval = nand_read (nand, offset, length, buffer);
if (rval != 0)
- printf ("NAND read from offset %zx failed %d\n",
+ printf ("NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
return rval;
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
size_t read_length;
if (nand_block_isbad (nand, offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1))) {
- printf ("Skipping bad block 0x%08zx\n",
+ printf ("Skipping bad block 0x%08llx\n",
offset & ~(nand->erasesize - 1));
offset += nand->erasesize - block_offset;
continue;
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
rval = nand_read (nand, offset, &read_length, p_buffer);
if (rval != 0) {
- printf ("NAND read from offset %zx failed %d\n",
+ printf ("NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
*length -= left_to_read;
return rval;
diff --git a/include/nand.h b/include/nand.h
index 065a42c..23f3ca1 100644
--- a/include/nand.h
+++ b/include/nand.h
@@ -38,22 +38,22 @@ typedef struct mtd_info nand_info_t;
extern int nand_curr_device;
extern nand_info_t nand_info[];
-static inline int nand_read(nand_info_t *info, off_t ofs, size_t *len, u_char *buf)
+static inline int nand_read(nand_info_t *info, loff_t ofs, size_t *len, u_char *buf)
{
return info->read(info, ofs, *len, (size_t *)len, buf);
}
-static inline int nand_write(nand_info_t *info, off_t ofs, size_t *len, u_char *buf)
+static inline int nand_write(nand_info_t *info, loff_t ofs, size_t *len, u_char *buf)
{
return info->write(info, ofs, *len, (size_t *)len, buf);
}
-static inline int nand_block_isbad(nand_info_t *info, off_t ofs)
+static inline int nand_block_isbad(nand_info_t *info, loff_t ofs)
{
return info->block_isbad(info, ofs);
}
-static inline int nand_erase(nand_info_t *info, off_t off, size_t size)
+static inline int nand_erase(nand_info_t *info, loff_t off, size_t size)
{
struct erase_info instr;
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ struct nand_erase_options {
typedef struct nand_erase_options nand_erase_options_t;
-int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
+int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
u_char *buffer);
-int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t offset, size_t *length,
+int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
u_char *buffer);
int nand_erase_opts(nand_info_t *meminfo, const nand_erase_options_t *opts);
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int nand_erase_opts(nand_info_t *meminfo, const nand_erase_options_t *opts);
int nand_lock( nand_info_t *meminfo, int tight );
int nand_unlock( nand_info_t *meminfo, ulong start, ulong length );
-int nand_get_lock_status(nand_info_t *meminfo, ulong offset);
+int nand_get_lock_status(nand_info_t *meminfo, loff_t offset);
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SELECT_DEVICE
void board_nand_select_device(struct nand_chip *nand, int chip);
--
1.6.2.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset
2009-05-16 12:27 [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
@ 2009-05-19 22:31 ` Scott Wood
2009-05-20 16:55 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-22 20:29 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2009-05-19 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> -static inline int nand_erase(nand_info_t *info, off_t off, size_t size)
> +static inline int nand_erase(nand_info_t *info, loff_t off, size_t size)
"size" should probably be loff_t (or something similarly sized) as well,
or erasing an entire large device at once could be awkward.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset
2009-05-19 22:31 ` Scott Wood
@ 2009-05-20 16:55 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2009-05-20 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 17:31 Tue 19 May , Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > -static inline int nand_erase(nand_info_t *info, off_t off, size_t size)
> > +static inline int nand_erase(nand_info_t *info, loff_t off, size_t size)
>
> "size" should probably be loff_t (or something similarly sized) as well,
> or erasing an entire large device at once could be awkward.
so we need to update the struct erase_info too as it handle a u_int32_t
Best Regards,
J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset
2009-05-16 12:27 [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-05-19 22:31 ` Scott Wood
@ 2009-06-22 20:29 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2009-06-22 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> nand_init currently use size_t which is arch dependent and not always a
> unsigned long. Now use loff_t as the linux mtd layer
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash, with the commit message cleaned up a bit (I
assume you meant nand_util rather than nand_init?).
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-22 20:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-16 12:27 [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_init: use loff_t for offset Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-05-19 22:31 ` Scott Wood
2009-05-20 16:55 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-22 20:29 ` Scott Wood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox