From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:37:05 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] UBI on NAND flash again In-Reply-To: <20090604092707.43A40832E416@gemini.denx.de> References: <20090603180551.GL26160@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <200906040856.51774.sr@denx.de> <20090604080655.GY26148@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <200906041015.30536.sr@denx.de> <20090604090740.GD26688@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <20090604092707.43A40832E416@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <20090604093705.GE26688@buzzloop.caiaq.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > Oh well - you're right. The code failed in vmalloc() due to a too small > > CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN which I needed to augment to 512kB. > > But then a big, fat error message is needed there! In vmalloc(), yes. That bug could hit any code that deals with dynamically allocated memory. Daniel