From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:30:41 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from
	common	Makefile to platform configs files
In-Reply-To: <200906200708.31469.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1245490407-22770-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
	<200906200618.16595.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<20090620104007.GD6870@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<200906200708.31469.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <20090620113041.GE6870@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 07:08 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 06:40:07 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 06:18 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 05:33:26 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > This patch moves the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel
> > > > Makefile to the arch_config.mk files. This is in preparation for the
> > > > ARM architecture to move away from including libgcc function and only
> > > > using self-contained U-Boot functions as done in Linux.
> > >
> > > why not change the top level Makefile to read:
> > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC ?= ...
> > >
> > > then any board/arch that doesnt want it can simply do:
> > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC = # dont want it
> >
> > because you need to provide the equivalent functions for standalone
> > application and api and U-Boot ofcourse
> 
> so move it to config.mk.  this doesnt change the important point: leave 
> PLATFORM_LIBGCC default in the toplevel common files.  what i proposed doesnt 
> limit what you want to do with arm in any way.
I think it's better to let it at arch level and force any new arch adding to
manage it instead provide a default one

Best Regards,
J.