public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common	Makefile to platform configs files
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:01:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090620130136.GF3849@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906200857.42360.vapier@gentoo.org>

On 08:57 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 07:30:41 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 07:08 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 06:40:07 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > On 06:18 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 05:33:26 Jean-Christophe wrote:
> > > > > > This patch moves the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel
> > > > > > Makefile to the arch_config.mk files. This is in preparation for
> > > > > > the ARM architecture to move away from including libgcc function
> > > > > > and only using self-contained U-Boot functions as done in Linux.
> > > > >
> > > > > why not change the top level Makefile to read:
> > > > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC ?= ...
> > > > >
> > > > > then any board/arch that doesnt want it can simply do:
> > > > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC = # dont want it
> > > >
> > > > because you need to provide the equivalent functions for standalone
> > > > application and api and U-Boot ofcourse
> > >
> > > so move it to config.mk.  this doesnt change the important point: leave
> > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC default in the toplevel common files.  what i proposed
> > > doesnt limit what you want to do with arm in any way.
> >
> > I think it's better to let it at arch level and force any new arch adding
> > to manage it instead provide a default one
> 
> considering most arches want this code, i dont think so.  you're proposing we 
> duplicate the same common code in all arches to support one deviating arch -- 
> arm.  the defaults should reflect the common state while the deviating ones 
> change the behavior as they like.
This is where I disagree other arch as mips and other will also need to move away
from the needs to include libgcc to be really toolchain independant

I do think it's really important for U-Boot be able to have full control to
have a functions embedded into.

So stop to have libgcc include by default will really reflect it

Best Regards,
J.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-20 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-20  9:33 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common Makefile to platform configs files Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20  9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V2] ARM: Don't include libgcc anymore Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-21 12:25   ` Dirk Behme
2009-06-20 10:18 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common Makefile to platform configs files Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 10:40   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 11:08     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 11:30       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 12:57         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 13:01           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2009-06-20 13:33             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 13:57               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 15:59                 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 17:15                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-10 22:27                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-22 18:55                 ` Scott Wood
2009-07-04 21:52 ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090620130136.GF3849@game.jcrosoft.org \
    --to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox