public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common	Makefile to platform configs files
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:15:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090620171547.GN3849@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906201159.59936.vapier@gentoo.org>

> > > >
> > > > This is where I disagree other arch as mips and other will also need to
> > > > move away from the needs to include libgcc to be really toolchain
> > > > independant
> > > >
> > > > I do think it's really important for U-Boot be able to have full
> > > > control to have a functions embedded into.
> > > >
> > > > So stop to have libgcc include by default will really reflect it
> > >
> > > so you have two arches (mips/arm) that you dont want to use libgcc.  that
> > > is still vastly the minority.  if we ever do get most ports not using
> > > libgcc, then pushing it to the arch configs makes sense.  but we havent
> > > and we arent even close.
> >
> > which minoroty?
> 
> the majority use libgcc
> 
> > I just give you example but you will see arm, mips, sh, powerpc etc...
> > toolchains problem just because we use the libgcc
> 
> 4 is still the minority, but this is Woflgang's call
> 
> > I've patch in qualification for mips and sh so it will not be so long
> > maybe 2 or 3 weeks
> 
> considering my proposed change is much simpler, and would allow for trivial
> migration as you converted things, it still makes more sense.
it's not the size of the change, it's just I do not agree with it

Best Regards,
J.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-20 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-20  9:33 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common Makefile to platform configs files Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20  9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V2] ARM: Don't include libgcc anymore Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-21 12:25   ` Dirk Behme
2009-06-20 10:18 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common Makefile to platform configs files Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 10:40   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 11:08     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 11:30       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 12:57         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 13:01           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 13:33             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 13:57               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-06-20 15:59                 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-20 17:15                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2009-07-10 22:27                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-22 18:55                 ` Scott Wood
2009-07-04 21:52 ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090620171547.GN3849@game.jcrosoft.org \
    --to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox