From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:54:27 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/6] Clean up top-level directory structure
In-Reply-To: <200907102242.07717.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1247241800-29059-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com>
	<1247272852.32367.241.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<4A57E8ED.3040604@pobox.com> <200907102242.07717.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <20090712125427.GD21713@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 22:42 Fri 10 Jul     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45 Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> > Peter Tyser wrote:
> > >> Before verifying MIPS builds, I'd like to make sure that why you take
> > >> lib/$(ARCH)/ alternative, not $(ARCH)/lib/.  If there were any
> > >> discussion on #IRC, is there any chance we could share the summary or
> > >> decision to follow?
> > >
> > > There was no discussion, /lib/$(ARCH) just made more sense to me and it
> > > was functionally a direct translation from lib_$(ARCH) to lib/$(ARCH).
> > >
> > > Using $(ARCH)/lib wouldn't clean up the top-level directory structure
> > > much and would open a can of worms that I'm not prepared to deal with at
> > > this time.  For example, if there was an architecture specific
> >
> > Oops, I wanted to say "arch/$(ARCH)/lib/", not $(ARCH)/lib/, sorry.
> 
> i thought that originally, but i dont care much either way.  having 
> arch/$(ARCH)/ would line up with u-boot-v2 and the linux kernel though.
> 
> i dont understand needing a lib/ subdir under arch/$(ARCH)/ though.
> 
> > > While we're talking about it, I'd always thought it would be nice to
> > > split out all the cmd_* files from common/ into their own command/
> > > directory similar to u-boot-v2.
> >
> > Ack.  The directory structure in u-boot-v2 looks nice, at least, to me,
> > anyway.
I prefer the
arch/$(ARCH)/lib
so will could also move the cpu stuff there too

for the command dir why not

Best Regards,
J.